Garron Deshazer1, Punit Prakash2, Derek Merck1, Dieter Haemmerich3. 1. a Department of Diagnostic Imaging , Rhode Island Hospital , Providence , Rhode Island , USA. 2. b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , Kansas State University , Manhattan , Kansas , USA. 3. c Department of Pediatrics , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , South Carolina , USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: For computational models of microwave ablation (MWA), knowledge of the antenna design is necessary, but the proprietary design of clinical applicators is often unknown. We characterised the specific absorption rate (SAR) during MWA experimentally and compared to a multi-physics simulation. METHODS: An infrared (IR) camera was used to measure SAR during MWA within a split ex vivo liver model. Perseon Medical's short-tip (ST) or long-tip (LT) MWA antenna were placed on top of a tissue sample (n = 6), and microwave power (15 W) was applied for 6 min, while intermittently interrupting power. Tissue surface temperature was recorded via IR camera (3.3 fps, 320 × 240 resolution). SAR was calculated intermittently based on temperature slope before and after power interruption. Temperature and SAR data were compared to simulation results. RESULTS: Experimentally measured SAR changed considerably once tissue temperatures exceeded 100 °C, contrary to simulation results. The ablation zone diameters were 1.28 cm and 1.30 ± 0.03 cm (transverse), and 2.10 cm and 2.66 ± -0.22 cm (axial), for simulation and experiment, respectively. The average difference in temperature between the simulation and experiment were 5.6 °C (ST) and 6.2 °C (LT). Dice coefficients for 1000 W/kg SAR iso-contour were 0.74 ± 0.01 (ST) and 0.77 (± 0.03) (LT), suggesting good agreement of SAR contours. CONCLUSION: We experimentally demonstrated changes in SAR during MWA ablation, which were not present in simulation, suggesting inaccuracies in dielectric properties. The measured SAR may be used in simplified computer simulations to predict tissue temperature when the antenna geometry is unknown.
INTRODUCTION: For computational models of microwave ablation (MWA), knowledge of the antenna design is necessary, but the proprietary design of clinical applicators is often unknown. We characterised the specific absorption rate (SAR) during MWA experimentally and compared to a multi-physics simulation. METHODS: An infrared (IR) camera was used to measure SAR during MWA within a split ex vivo liver model. Perseon Medical's short-tip (ST) or long-tip (LT) MWA antenna were placed on top of a tissue sample (n = 6), and microwave power (15 W) was applied for 6 min, while intermittently interrupting power. Tissue surface temperature was recorded via IR camera (3.3 fps, 320 × 240 resolution). SAR was calculated intermittently based on temperature slope before and after power interruption. Temperature and SAR data were compared to simulation results. RESULTS: Experimentally measured SAR changed considerably once tissue temperatures exceeded 100 °C, contrary to simulation results. The ablation zone diameters were 1.28 cm and 1.30 ± 0.03 cm (transverse), and 2.10 cm and 2.66 ± -0.22 cm (axial), for simulation and experiment, respectively. The average difference in temperature between the simulation and experiment were 5.6 °C (ST) and 6.2 °C (LT). Dice coefficients for 1000 W/kg SAR iso-contour were 0.74 ± 0.01 (ST) and 0.77 (± 0.03) (LT), suggesting good agreement of SAR contours. CONCLUSION: We experimentally demonstrated changes in SAR during MWA ablation, which were not present in simulation, suggesting inaccuracies in dielectric properties. The measured SAR may be used in simplified computer simulations to predict tissue temperature when the antenna geometry is unknown.
Authors: Deshan Yang; John M Bertram; Mark C Converse; Ann P O'Rourke; John G Webster; Susan C Hagness; James A Will; David M Mahvi Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Brogan T McWilliams; Emily E Schnell; Sergio Curto; Thomas M Fahrbach; Punit Prakash Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Amy Lee Bredlau; Anjan Motamarry; Chao Chen; M A McCrackin; Kris Helke; Kent E Armeson; Katrina Bynum; Ann-Marie Broome; Dieter Haemmerich Journal: Drug Deliv Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 6.419