Literature DB >> 24086075

Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates.

Ichiro Ikuta1, Graham I Warden, Katherine P Andriole, Ramin Khorasani, Aaron Sodickson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that patient size can be accurately calculated from axial computed tomographic (CT) images, including correction for the effects of anatomy truncation that occur in routine clinical CT image reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, with waiver of informed consent. Water-equivalent diameter (D(W)) was computed from the attenuation-area product of each image within 50 adult CT scans of the thorax and of the abdomen and pelvis and was also measured for maximal field of view (FOV) reconstructions. Linear regression models were created to compare D(W) with the effective diameter (D(eff)) used to select size-specific volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) conversion factors as defined in report 204 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Linear regression models relating reductions in measured D(W) to a metric of anatomy truncation were used to compensate for the effects of clinical image truncation.
RESULTS: In the thorax, D(W)versus D(eff) had an R(2) of 0.51 (n = 200, 50 patients at four anatomic locations); in the abdomen and pelvis, R(2) was 0.90 (n = 150, 50 patients at three anatomic locations). By correcting for image truncation, the proportion of clinically reconstructed images with an extracted D(W) within ±5% of the maximal FOV D(W) increased from 54% to 90% in the thorax (n = 3602 images) and from 95% to 100% in the abdomen and pelvis (6181 images).
CONCLUSION: The D(W) extracted from axial CT images is a reliable measure of patient size, and varying degrees of clinical image truncation can be readily corrected. Automated measurement of patient size combined with CT radiation exposure metrics may enable patient-specific dose estimation on a large scale. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24086075      PMCID: PMC4228751          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.

Authors:  Gary M Israel; Lawrence Cicchiello; James Brink; Walter Huda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  IT tools will be critical in helping reduce radiation exposure from medical imaging.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Aaron D Sodickson; Katherine P Andriole; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  CT radiation risks coming into clearer focus.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21

5.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Awais Vance
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

7.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT.

Authors:  Kent Ogden; Walter Huda; Ernest M Scalzetti; Marsha L Roskopf
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Abdomen: angiography with 16-detector CT--comparison of image quality and radiation dose between studies with 0.625-mm and those with 1.25-mm collimation.

Authors:  Toshiharu Miyoshi; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kondo; Satoshi Goshima; Yusuke Tsuge; Atsushi Hatcho; Yoshimune Shiratori; Minoru Onozuka; Noriyuki Moriyama; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  12 in total

1.  A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Authors:  Roshni A Parikh; Michael A Wien; Ronald D Novak; David W Jordan; Paul Klahr; Stephanie Soriano; Leslie Ciancibello; Sheila C Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27

2.  Automated detection of z-axis coverage with abdomen-pelvis computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Clinton Wellnitz; Can Cui; William Pavlicek; Teresa Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Opportunities to Reduce CT Radiation Exposure, Experience Over 5 Years at the NIH Clinical Center.

Authors:  William C Kovacs; Jianhua Yao; David A Bluemke; Les R Folio
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Evaluation of AAPM Reports 204 and 220: Estimation of effective diameter, water-equivalent diameter, and ellipticity ratios for chest, abdomen, pelvis, and head CT scans.

Authors:  Christiane S Burton; Timothy P Szczykutowicz
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A simple manual method to estimate water-equivalent diameter for calculating size-specific dose estimate in chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Dimitris Mihailidis; Virginia Tsapaki; Pelagia Tomara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Radiation concerns in frequent flyer patients: should imaging history influence decisions about recurrent imaging?

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Automatic calculation of patient size metrics in computed tomography: What level of computational accuracy do we need?

Authors:  Sandra Sarmento; Bruno Mendes; Margarida Gouvêa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Automated Calculation of Water-equivalent Diameter (DW) Based on AAPM Task Group 220.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Freddy Haryanto; Rena Widita; Idam Arif; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates of Radiation Based on Body Weight and Body Mass Index for Chest and Abdomen-Pelvic CTs.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Xiangquan Wang; Panfeng Yang; Kuangnan Luo; Xiaolong He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.