Literature DB >> 24081642

Surgeon's volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Sandra C Donkervoort1, Lea M Dijksman, Pieter G Versluis, Emile A Clous, Anco C Vahl.   

Abstract

AIM: Complication rates after laparoscopic cholecystectomy vary but are still reported to be up to 17 %. Identifying risk factors for an adverse complication outcome could help to reduce morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our aim was to analyze whether surgeon volume is a vital issue for complication outcome.
METHODS: All complications-minor, major, local and general-were reviewed in a single institution between January 2004 and December 2008 and recorded in a database. Patient's variables, disease related variables and surgeon's variables were noted. The role of surgeon's individual volume per year was analyzed. A stepwise logistic regression model was used.
RESULTS: A total of 942 patients were analyzed, among which 70 (7 %) patients with acute cholecystitis and 52 (6 %) patients with delayed surgery for acute cholecystitis. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) had been performed in 142 (15 %) patients. Complication rates did not differ significantly for surgeon's individual volume (≤10 vs. >10 LC/year, 5.2 vs. 8.2 %, p = 0.203) nor for specialization (laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic; 9.2 vs. 6.4 %, p = 0.085) and experience (specialty registration ≤5 vs. >5 years; 5.1 vs. 8.7 %, p = 0.069). The only significant predictors for complications were acute surgery (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.8-8.7, p = 0.001) and a history preceding laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (ERC and delayed surgery for cholecystitis) (OR 8.1, 95 % CI 4.5-14.6: p <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Complications after LC were not significantly associated with a surgeon's individual volume, but most prominently determined by the type of biliary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24081642     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2885-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

1.  Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.

Authors:  Philip R de Reuver; Irene Grossmann; Olivier R Busch; Huug Obertop; Thomas M van Gulik; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Who should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A 10-year audit.

Authors:  A P Boddy; J M H Bennett; S Ranka; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  D Boerma; E A Rauws; Y C Keulemans; J J Bergman; H Obertop; K Huibregtse; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.

Authors:  H I Hendolin; M E Pääkönen; E M Alhava; R Tarvainen; T Kemppinen; P Lahtinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-05

5.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.

Authors:  Emily V A Finlayson; Philip P Goodney; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score.

Authors:  Melissa M Murphy; Shimul A Shah; Jessica P Simons; Nicholas G Csikesz; Theodore P McDade; Andreea Bodnari; Sing-Chau Ng; Zheng Zhou; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by transabdominal lateral approach: 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Thibaut Coste; Robert Caiazzo; Fanelly Torres; Marie Christine Vantyghem; Bruno Carnaille; Christine Do Cao; Claire Douillard; François Pattou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Patient and surgeon factors contributing to bailout cholecystectomies: a single-institutional retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Miya C Yoshida; Takuya Ogami; Kaylee Ho; Eileen X Bui; Shahenda Khedr; Chun-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.

Authors:  K Cremer; F W H Kloppenberg; J W Vanhommerig; L M Dijksman; N Bode; S C Donkervoort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Anticipation of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prediction of individual outcome.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; K Kortram; L M Dijksman; M A Boermeester; B van Ramshorst; D Boerma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Impact of Hospital/Surgeon Volume on Acute Renal Failure and Mortality in Liver Transplantation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chih-Wen Cheng; Fu-Chao Liu; Jr-Rung Lin; Yung-Fong Tsai; Hsiu-Pin Chen; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Szabolcs Ábrahám; Tibor Németh; Ria Benkő; Mária Matuz; Dániel Váczi; Illés Tóth; Aurél Ottlakán; László Andrási; János Tajti; Viktor Kovács; József Pieler; László Libor; Attila Paszt; Zsolt Simonka; György Lázár
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Immediate postoperative pain: an atypical presentation of dropped gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samba Binagi; Jason Keune; Michael Awad
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-01-14

8.  Association between hospital liver transplantation volume and mortality after liver re-transplantation.

Authors:  Seung-Young Oh; Eun Jin Jang; Ga Hee Kim; Hannah Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Seokha Yoo; Bo Rim Kim; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The association between hospital case-volume and postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bo Rim Kim; Eun Jin Jang; Junwoo Jo; Hannah Lee; Dong Yeon Jang; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.