Literature DB >> 27129543

Anticipation of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prediction of individual outcome.

S C Donkervoort1, K Kortram2, L M Dijksman3, M A Boermeester4, B van Ramshorst2, D Boerma2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complication rates after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy are still up to 10 %. Knowledge of individual patient risk profiles could help to reduce morbidity. AIM: The aim of this study is to create risk profiles for specific complications to anticipate on individual outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient outcome for a specific post-operative complication was assessed from a retrospective database of two major teaching hospitals, using uni- and multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 4359 patients were included of which 346 developed one or more complications (8 %). Five risk profiles were found to predict specific complications: older patients (>65 year) are at risk for pneumonia (OR 7.0, 95 % CI 3.3-15.0, p < 0.001) and bleeding (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.2-3.9, p = 0.014), patients with acute cholecystitis are at risk for intra-abdominal abscess (OR 5.9, 95 % CI 3.4-10.1, p < 0.001), bile leakage (OR 3.6, 95 % CI 2.0-6.6, p < 0.001) and pneumonia (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 1.6-7.6, p < 0.002), previous history of cholecystitis is predictive for wound infection (OR 5.1, 95 % CI, (2.7-9.7), p < 0.001), intra-abdominal abscess (OR 6.1, 95 % CI 2.8-13.8, p < 0.001), post-operative bleeding (OR 4.8, 95 % CI 2.1-11.1, p < 0.001), bile leakage (OR 7.2, 95 % CI 3.4-15.4, p < 0.001) and pneumonia (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.3-11.9, p = 0.018), pre-operative ERCP is predictive for intra-abdominal abscess (OR 3.3, 95 % CI 2.0-5.7, p < 0.001), post-operative bleeding (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.2-3.9, p = 0.058) and pneumonia (OR 3.8, 95 % CI 1.9-7.8, p = 0.001), and converted patients are at risk for wound infection (OR 4.0, 95 % CI 2.1-7.7, p < 0.001) and intra-abdominal abscess (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 1.6-7.7, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Individual risk prediction of outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible. This facilitates individual pre-operative doctor-patient communication and may tailor surgical strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipation; Cholecystectomy; Individual; Laparoscopic; Post-operative complications

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27129543     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4895-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Overlapped-clipping, a new technique for ligation of a wide cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ibrahim S A Abbas
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Who should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A 10-year audit.

Authors:  A P Boddy; J M H Bennett; S Ranka; M Rhodes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledochocystolithiasis.

Authors:  Jan Siert K Reinders; Annemarie Goud; Robin Timmer; Philip M Kruyt; Philip M Kruijt; Ben J M Witteman; Niels Smakman; Ronald Breumelhof; Sandra C Donkervoort; Jeroen M Jansen; Joos Heisterkamp; Marina Grubben; Marina Grobben; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Tay Khoon Hean; Lim Swee Ho; T Ravintharan; Tan Ngian Chye; Chng Hong Chee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  [Conversion has to be learned: bile duct injury following conversion to open cholecystectomy].

Authors:  Klaske A C Booij; Philip R de Reuver; Otto M van Delden; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2009

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more difficult after a previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Jan Siert Kayitsinga Reinders; Dirk Joan Gouma; Joos Heisterkamp; Ellen Tromp; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  10 in total

1.  Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement.

Authors:  Meredith Barrett; Horacio J Asbun; Hung-Lung Chien; L Michael Brunt; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Are They Too Old for Surgery? Safety of Cholecystectomy in Superelderly Patients (≥ Age 90).

Authors:  Busayo Irojah; Ted Bell; Rodney Grim; Jennifer Martin; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

3.  An Innovative Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Technique; Early Results Towards Complication Free Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed Mahmood Nasr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The effect of surgical strategy in difficult cholecystectomy cases on postoperative complications outcome: a value-based healthcare comparative study.

Authors:  K Cremer; F W H Kloppenberg; J W Vanhommerig; L M Dijksman; N Bode; S C Donkervoort
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  A Simple Risk Score to Predict Clavien-Dindo Grade IV and V Complications After Non-elective Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Burke; Rishi Rattan; Shaina Sedighim; Minjae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Patient-Related Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection After Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Gona Jaafar; Folke Hammarqvist; Lars Enochsson; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Acute Care Surgery model: risk factors for complications.

Authors:  Emily Fletcher; Erica Seabold; Karen Herzing; Ronald Markert; Alyssa Gans; Akpofure Peter Ekeh
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  Incidence, Patient-Related Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Postoperative Pneumonia after Cholecystectomy: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yun-Hui Teng; Fu-Chao Liu; Keng-Hao Liu; Jr-Rung Lin; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Predictive Factors for Long Operative Duration in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography for Combined Choledochocystolithiasis.

Authors:  Ryukyung Lee; Heontak Ha; Young Seok Han; Min Kyu Jung; Jae Min Chun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  Systematic review of cystic duct closure techniques in relation to prevention of bile duct leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Aafke H van Dijk; Stijn van Roessel; Philip R de Reuver; Djamila Boerma; Marja A Boermeester; Sandra C Donkervoort
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.