Literature DB >> 18668287

Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Nicholas Csikesz1, Rocco Ricciardi, Jennifer F Tseng, Shimul A Shah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We attempted to determine population-based outcomes of laparoscopic (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).
METHODS: We used the National Hospital Discharge Surveys from 2000 through 2005. Annual medical and demographic data from a national sample of discharge records from nonfederal, short-stay hospitals were queried. We identified all patients who underwent LC or OC for AC. The main outcome measures were the rate of LC or OC and in-hospital morbidity and mortality. One million patients underwent cholecystectomy (859,747 LCs; 152,202 OCs) for AC during 2000-2005.
RESULTS: Of the cases started laparoscopically, 9.5% were converted to OC. Compared to OC, patients who underwent LC were more likely to be discharged home (91% vs. 70%), carry private insurance (47% vs. 30%), suffer less morbidity (16% vs. 36%), and have a lower unadjusted mortality (0.4% vs. 3.0%). OC was associated with a 1.3-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4) in perioperative morbidity compared to LC after adjusting for patient and hospital factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in the 21st century with AC undergo LC with a low conversion rate and low morbidity. In the general population with acute cholecystitis, LC results in lower morbidity and mortality rates than OC even in the setting of open conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668287     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9679-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

1.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure.

Authors:  P C Willsher; J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; L Rossi; S Strasberg; D E Litwin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study.

Authors:  A Brodsky; I Matter; E Sabo; A Cohen; J Abrahamson; S Eldar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique.

Authors:  K Slim; D Pezet; J Stencl; C Lechner; S Le Roux; P Lointier; J Chipponi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Treatment of acute cholecystitis. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Z Glavic; L Begic; D Simlesa; A Rukavina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; M Stiernstam; B Westman; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Koperna; M Kisser; F Schulz
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

9.  Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  D W Rattner; C Ferguson; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Kiviluoto; J Sirén; P Luukkonen; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have a negative effect on laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Murat Çakır; Tevfik Küçükkartallar; Ahmet Tekin; Mehmet Aykut Yıldırım; Adil Kartal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-04-09

3.  The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997-2006.

Authors:  James P Dolan; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Anand Singla; Melissa M Murphy; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Long-term outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis receiving antibiotic treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Hao-Chang Chou; Kao-Lang Liu; Wan-Ching Lien; Hsiu-Po Wang; Yao-Ming Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Nereo Vettoretto; Gianfranco Silecchia; Carlo Bergamini; Pietro Maida; Pietro Lombari; Piero Narilli; Domenico Marchi; Alessandro Carrara; Maria Grazia Esposito; Stefania Fiume; Giuseppe Miranda; Simona Barlera; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Jiawen Zhu; Caitlin Halbert; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within and beyond 72 h of symptom onset during emergency admissions.

Authors:  Bin Zhu; Zhanzhi Zhang; Yan Wang; Ke Gong; Yiping Lu; Nengwei Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effects of cholecystectomy on recurrent biliary complications after endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stone: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Chi-Tung Cheng; Chun-Nan Yeh; Kun-Chun Chiang; Ta-Sen Yeh; Kuan-Fu Chen; Shao-Wei Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Massimo Chiarugi; Christian Galatioto; Luigi Decanini; Adolfo Puglisi; Piero Lippolis; Chiara Bagnato; Sonia Panicucci; Marco Pelosini; Pietro Iacconi; Massimo Seccia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.