Literature DB >> 19672665

Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score.

Melissa M Murphy1, Shimul A Shah, Jessica P Simons, Nicholas G Csikesz, Theodore P McDade, Andreea Bodnari, Sing-Chau Ng, Zheng Zhou, Jennifer F Tseng.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reported morbidity varies widely for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A reliable method to determine complication risk may be useful to optimize care. We developed an integer-based risk score to determine the likelihood of major complications following LC.
METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998-2006, patient discharges for LC were identified. Using previously validated methods, major complications were assessed. Preoperative covariates including patient demographics, disease characteristics, and hospital factors were used in logistic regression/bootstrap analyses to generate an integer score predicting postoperative complication rates. A randomly selected 80% was used to create the risk score, with validation in the remaining 20%.
RESULTS: Patient discharges (561,923) were identified with an overall complication rate of 6.5%. Predictive characteristics included: age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, biliary tract inflammation, hospital teaching status, and admission type. Integer values were assigned and used to calculate an additive score. Three groups stratifying risk were assembled, with a fourfold gradient for complications ranging from 3.2% to 13.5%. The score discriminated well in both derivation and validation sets (c-statistic of 0.7).
CONCLUSION: An integer-based risk score can be used to predict complications following LC and may assist in preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672665     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0979-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W P Joyce; R Keane; G J Burke; M Daly; J Drumm; T J Egan; P V Delaney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center?

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; Jessica P Simons; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Alexandros Polychronidis; Sotirios Botaitis; Alexandra Tsaroucha; Grigoris Tripsianis; Anastasios Bounovas; Michail Pitiakoudis; Constantinos Simopoulos
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.008

4.  A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Kologlu; M Doganay; E Reis; M Atli; M Dolapci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State: mortality, complications, and choice of procedure.

Authors:  E L Hannan; P J Imperato; R P Nenner; H Starr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital.

Authors:  D R Baird; J P Wilson; E M Mason; T D Duncan; J S Evans; J P Luke; D M Ruben; G W Lucas
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Perioperative mortality for management of hepatic neoplasm: a simple risk score.

Authors:  Jessica P Simons; Joshua S Hill; Sing Chau Ng; Shimul A Shah; Zheng Zhou; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Operative mortality after hepatic resection: are literature-based rates broadly applicable?

Authors:  Bolanle Asiyanbola; David Chang; Ana Luiza Gleisner; Hari Nathan; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  5 in total

1.  The degree of gallbladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shankar R Raman; Dovid Moradi; Bassem M Samaan; Umar S Chaudhry; Kamal Nagpal; John Morgan Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  MRCP is not a cost-effective strategy in the management of silent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; John D Allendorf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgeon's volume is not associated with complication outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Pieter G Versluis; Emile A Clous; Anco C Vahl
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Early cross-sectional imaging following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Anna Maria Ierardi; Francesca Patella; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-11-02

5.  Risk Factors of Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Manabu Sato; Koujin Endo; Akihiko Harada; Masahiro Shijo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.