Literature DB >> 11839068

Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer.

Roland Hustinx1, François Bénard, Abass Alavi.   

Abstract

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is increasingly used for the management of patients with cancer. The technique is now well accepted by most physicians as an effective complement to the existing imaging modalities. For many malignancies, PET achieves high sensitivity and specificity. The critical role of this powerful technique is realized increasingly in the day-to-day practice of oncology. This is particularly true for the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The contribution of PET for the selection of patients eligible for curative treatments in this setting is well established. Convincing data also exist to support the use of PET for evaluating patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma, for staging and restaging lymphomas, and for diagnosing recurrent thyroid carcinoma in the presence of elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scans. Other indications include staging of various recurrent malignancies, such as breast cancer, melanoma, and head and neck and gynecologic carcinomas. Existing data are limited for the determination of the impact of PET in certain malignancies, and further studies, which should include outcome information, will allow clarification of the role of this modality for such indications. Despite the small number of studies specifically designed to assess changes in management plans for some malignancies after performing PET the overall favorable results are encouraging enough at this time to include this modality as an essential element of the practice of modern oncology. Finally, the evolving role of PET imaging as a predictor of response after local or systemic treatment may add a major dimension to the application of this novel technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11839068     DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2002.29272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  53 in total

1.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Castleman's disease and Kaposi sarcoma, disorders associated with human herpes virus 8 infection.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Giorgio Biasiotto; Rosita Rodella; Raffaele Giubbini; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? For.

Authors:  Michiru Ide; Yutaka Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Development and validation of queries using structured query language (SQL) to determine the utilization of comparison imaging in radiology reports stored on PACS.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Elliot D Menschik; Alberto F Goldszal; Joseph P Murray; Mark G Weiner; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography in characterization of solid renal masses.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Anil Chauhan; Paras Lakhani; Yan Xiu; Hongming Zhuang; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Unexpected FDG-PET uptake in the gastrointestinal tract: endoscopic and histopathological correlations.

Authors:  Eran Goldin; Mahmud Mahamid; Benjamin Koslowsky; Shimon Shteingart; Yael Dubner; Gadi Lalazar; Dov Wengrower
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  FDG-PET imaging to detect and characterize infectious disorders; an unavoidable path for the foreseeable future.

Authors:  Abass Alavi; Thomas J Werner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Effect of blood glucose level on standardized uptake value (SUV) in 18F- FDG PET-scan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20,807 individual SUV measurements.

Authors:  Mahsa Eskian; Abass Alavi; MirHojjat Khorasanizadeh; Benjamin L Viglianti; Hans Jacobsson; Tara D Barwick; Alipasha Meysamie; Sun K Yi; Shingo Iwano; Bohdan Bybel; Federico Caobelli; Filippo Lococo; Joaquim Gea; Antonio Sancho-Muñoz; Jukka Schildt; Ebru Tatcı; Constantin Lapa; Georgia Keramida; Michael Peters; Raef R Boktor; Joemon John; Alexander G Pitman; Tomasz Mazurek; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Detection of gastric cancer using 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Reiko Kameyama; Yuka Yamamoto; Kunihiko Izuishi; Ryusuke Takebayashi; Masanobu Hagiike; Makiko Murota; Masato Kaji; Reiji Haba; Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Tevfik F Cermik; Ayse Mavi; Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.