Literature DB >> 24080222

Prostate cancer gene 3 and multiparametric magnetic resonance can reduce unnecessary biopsies: decision curve analysis to evaluate predictive models.

Gian Maria Busetto1, Ettore De Berardinis, Alessandro Sciarra, Valeria Panebianco, Riccardo Giovannone, Stefano Rosato, Paola D'Errigo, Franco Di Silverio, Vincenzo Gentile, Stefano Salciccia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To overcome the well-known prostate-specific antigen limits, several new biomarkers have been proposed. Since its introduction in clinical practice, the urinary prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) assay has shown promising results for prostate cancer (PC) detection. Furthermore, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) has the ability to better describe several aspects of PC.
METHODS: A prospective study of 171 patients with negative prostate biopsy findings and a persistent high prostate-specific antigen level was conducted to assess the role of mMRI and PCA3 in identifying PC. All patients underwent the PCA3 test and mMRI before a second transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. The accuracy and reliability of PCA3 (3 different cutoff points) and mMRI were evaluated. Four multivariate logistic regression models were analyzed, in terms of discrimination and the cost benefit, to assess the clinical role of PCA3 and mMRI in predicting the biopsy outcome. A decision curve analysis was also plotted.
RESULTS: Repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy identified 68 new cases (41.7%) of PC. The sensitivity and specificity of the PCA3 test and mMRI was 68% and 49% and 74% and 90%, respectively. Evaluating the regression models, the best discrimination (area under the curve 0.808) was obtained using the full model (base clinical model plus mMRI and PCA3). The decision curve analysis, to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio, showed good performance in predicting PC with the model that included mMRI and PCA3.
CONCLUSION: mMRI increased the accuracy and sensitivity of the PCA3 test, and the use of the full model significantly improved the cost/benefit ratio, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24080222     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

Review 1.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Geert Villeirs; Inderbir S Gill; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Kaufmann; J Bedke; S Gatidis; J Hennenlotter; U Kramer; M Notohamiprodjo; K Nikolaou; A Stenzl; S Kruck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer: current applications and strategies.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Hashim U Ahmed; Caroline M Moore; Mark Emberton; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Current Knowledge to the Role of Metabolomics and Exosomes.

Authors:  Stefano Salciccia; Anna Laura Capriotti; Aldo Laganà; Stefano Fais; Mariantonia Logozzi; Ettore De Berardinis; Gian Maria Busetto; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Gian Piero Ricciuti; Francesco Del Giudice; Alessandro Sciarra; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Beatrice Sciarra; Martina Maggi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Optimizing patient's selection for prostate biopsy: A single institution experience with multi-parametric MRI and the 4Kscore test for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sanoj Punnen; Bruno Nahar; Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Radka Stoyanova; Alan Pollack; Bruce Kava; Mark L Gonzalgo; Chad R Ritch; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of PCA3 and multiparametric MRI's: collective benefits before deciding initial prostate biopsy for patients with PSA level between 3-10ng/mL.

Authors:  Sezgin Okcelik; Hasan Soydan; Ferhat Ates; Ufuk Berber; Hasan Saygin; Guner Sonmez; Kenan Karademir
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Nikhil Waingankar; Baris Turkbey; Oksana Yaskiv; Anna M Sonstegard; Mathew Fakhoury; Carl A Olsson; David N Siegel; Peter L Choyke; Eran Ben-Levi; Robert Villani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph M Norris; Benjamin S Simpson; Marina A Parry; Clare Allen; Rhys Ball; Alex Freeman; Daniel Kelly; Hyung L Kim; Alex Kirkham; Sungyong You; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Hayley C Whitaker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.