Literature DB >> 31316185

Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Armando Stabile1,2,3, Francesco Giganti4,5, Andrew B Rosenkrantz6, Samir S Taneja6,7, Geert Villeirs8, Inderbir S Gill9, Clare Allen5, Mark Emberton4,10, Caroline M Moore4,10, Veeru Kasivisvanathan4,10.   

Abstract

The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could mitigate these diagnostic errors. The performance of mpMRI can vary depending on the population being studied, the execution of the MRI itself, the experience of the radiologist, whether additional biomarkers are considered and whether mpMRI-targeted biopsy is carried out alone or in addition to systematic biopsy. A number of challenges to implementation remain, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. Nevertheless, emerging clinical trial data support the adoption of this technology as part of the standard of care for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31316185     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  146 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.

Authors:  Katherine Fleshner; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Meghan S Weyrich; Shauna Durbin; Yu Liu; Heejung Bang; Joy Melnikow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Structured Population-based Prostate-specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2019.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Peter Albers; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Alberto Briganti; James W F Catto; Christopher R Chapple; Francesco Montorsi; Nicolas Mottet; Monique J Roobol; Jens Sønksen; Manfred Wirth; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Mia Djulbegovic; Jae Hung Jung; Eu Chang Hwang; Qi Zhou; Anne Cleves; Thomas Agoritsas; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-05
View more
  50 in total

1.  Current Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Germany: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Matthias Saar; Johannes Linxweiler; Angelika Borkowetz; Sebastian Fussek; Katerina Urbanova; Laura Bellut; Glen Kristiansen; Bernd Wullich
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  3D Registration of pre-surgical prostate MRI and histopathology images via super-resolution volume reconstruction.

Authors:  Rewa R Sood; Wei Shao; Christian Kunder; Nikola C Teslovich; Jeffrey B Wang; Simon J C Soerensen; Nikhil Madhuripan; Anugayathri Jawahar; James D Brooks; Pejman Ghanouni; Richard E Fan; Geoffrey A Sonn; Mirabela Rusu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  [Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) : Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnostic oncology].

Authors:  N von Knebel Doeberitz; S Maksimovic; L Loi; D Paech
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Author reply Re: Singh S, Patil S, Tamhankar AS, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option? Indian J Urol 2020;36:184-90.

Authors:  Shanky Singh; Saurabh Patil; Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 7.  A narrative review of MRI acquisition for MR-guided-radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jing Yuan; Darren M C Poon; Gladys Lo; Oi Lei Wong; Kin Yin Cheung; Siu Ki Yu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

8.  Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Gianluca Giannarini; Caroline M Moore; Anwar R Padhani; Valeria Panebianco; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Georg Salomon; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17

9.  Development and validation of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics signature for distinguishing between indolent and aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liuhui Zhang; Donggen Jiang; Chujie Chen; Xiangwei Yang; Hanqi Lei; Zhuang Kang; Hai Huang; Jun Pang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Improving the sensitivity of T 1 contrast-enhanced MRI and sensitive diagnosing tumors with ultralow doses of MnO octahedrons.

Authors:  Lijiao Yang; Lili Wang; Guoming Huang; Xuan Zhang; Lanlan Chen; Ao Li; Jinhao Gao; Zijian Zhou; Lichao Su; Huanghao Yang; Jibin Song
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.