Literature DB >> 32112055

All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Derek J Lomas1,2,3, Hashim U Ahmed4,5.   

Abstract

Following detection of high levels of serum prostate-specific antigen, many men are advised to have transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in an attempt to locate a cancer. This nontargeted approach lacks accuracy and carries a small risk of potentially life-threatening sepsis. Worse still, it can detect clinically insignificant cancer cells, which are unlikely to be the origin of advanced-stage disease. The detection of these indolent cancer cells has led to overdiagnosis, one of the major problems of contemporary medicine, whereby many men with clinically insignificant disease are advised to undergo unnecessary radical surgery or radiotherapy. Advances in imaging and biomarker discovery have led to a revolution in prostate cancer diagnosis, and nontargeted prostate biopsies should become obsolete. In this Perspective article, we describe the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer, which relies on nontargeted biopsies, and the problems linked to this pathway. We then discuss the utility of prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and novel tumour markers. Finally, we comment on how the incorporation of these advances into a new diagnostic pathway will affect the current risk-stratification system and explore future challenges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112055     DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0332-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  112 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance.

Authors:  John Graham; Peter Kirkbride; Kimberley Cann; Elise Hasler; Matthew Prettyjohns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-08

2.  Correlation of ultrasound guided and digitally directed transrectal biopsies of palpable prostatic abnormalities.

Authors:  R P Weaver; M J Noble; J W Weigel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Nathalie Nicolaiew; Charles Marchand; Stéphane Terry; Francis Vacherot; Dimitri Vordos; Yves Allory; Claude-Clément Abbou; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prostatic-specific antigen: an immunohistologic marker for prostatic neoplasms.

Authors:  M Nadji; S Z Tabei; A Castro; T M Chu; G P Murphy; M C Wang; A R Morales
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Use of human prostate-specific antigen in monitoring prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Kuriyama; M C Wang; C I Lee; L D Papsidero; C S Killian; H Inaji; N H Slack; T Nishiura; G P Murphy; T M Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate.

Authors:  Alexandre de la Taille; Patrick Antiphon; Laurent Salomon; Maguy Cherfan; Raphael Porcher; Andras Hoznek; Fabien Saint; Dimitri Vordos; Anthony Cicco; René Yiou; Elie Serge Zafrani; Dominique Chopin; Claude Clément Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  12 in total

1.  MRI, TRUS or both?

Authors:  Peter Sidaway
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Histopathological Analysis of False-positive Lesions in mpMRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Ryoken Yamanaka; Yohei Sekino; Takashi Babasaki; Kohei Kobatake; Hiroyuki Kitano; Kenichiro Ikeda; Keisuke Goto; Tetsutaro Hayashi; Jun Teishima; Yukio Takeshima; Yukiko Honda; Kazuo Awai; Nobuyuki Hinata
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Proteomic discovery of non-invasive biomarkers of localized prostate cancer using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amanda Khoo; Lydia Y Liu; Julius O Nyalwidhe; O John Semmes; Danny Vesprini; Michelle R Downes; Paul C Boutros; Stanley K Liu; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Tissue immunostaining of candidate prognostic proteins in metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Érica Romão Pereira; Laís Capelasso Lucas Pinheiro; Amanda Letícia Francelino; Carlos Alberto Miqueloto; Alda Fiorina Maria Losi Guembarovski; Karen Brajão de Oliveira; Paulo Emílio Fuganti; Ilce Mara de Syllos Cólus; Roberta Losi Guembarovski
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.322

5.  The cell cycle gene centromere protein K (CENPK) contributes to the malignant progression and prognosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xuanrong Chen; Yi Shao; Yang Li; Zhao Yang; Yutong Chen; Wenyue Yu; Zhiqun Shang; Wanqing Wei
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 0.496

Review 6.  Overdiagnosis in urologic cancer : For World Journal of Urology Symposium on active surveillance in prostate and renal cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  miR-96-5p, miR-134-5p, miR-181b-5p and miR-200b-3p heterogenous expression in sites of prostate cancer versus benign prostate hyperplasia-archival samples study.

Authors:  Kacper Pełka; Klaudia Klicka; Tomasz M Grzywa; Agata Gondek; Janina M Marczewska; Filip Garbicz; Kinga Szczepaniak; Wiktor Paskal; Paweł K Włodarski
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  The ReIMAGINE prostate cancer risk study protocol: A prospective cohort study in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer who are referred onto an MRI-based diagnostic pathway with donation of tissue, blood and urine for biomarker analyses.

Authors:  Teresa Marsden; Neil McCartan; Louise Brown; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Tom Syer; Giorgio Brembilla; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Ton Coolen; Gerhardt Attard; Shonit Punwani; Caroline M Moore; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MiR-363-3p promotes prostate cancer tumor progression by targeting Dickkopf 3.

Authors:  Li-Zhe Xu; Jin-Zhuo Ning; Yuan Ruan; Fan Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based MRI for Differentiation Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Rui Luo; Qingxiang Zeng; Huashan Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.