S Kaufmann1,2, J Bedke3, S Gatidis4, J Hennenlotter5, U Kramer4, M Notohamiprodjo4, K Nikolaou4, A Stenzl5, S Kruck5. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. sascha.kaufmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 2. Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. sascha.kaufmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 3. Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. bedke@live.com. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves diagnostic accuracy in re-biopsies of men with prostate cancer (PC) suspicion, but predictive value is limited despite the use of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Prognostic value of the PC-specific biomarker prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) added to the PI-RADS score was evaluated. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the institutional database for men with MR-guided biopsy (MR-GB) for suspicious lesion in mpMRI and who had an additional pre-MR-GB PCA3 testing for ongoing PC suspicion. All men had ≥ 1 negative ultrasound GB. Lesions were retrospectively scored by PI-RADS in three MRI sequences (T2w, DCE, and DWI). PCA3 was analyzed with cutoffs of 25 and 35. The prognostic value of mpMRI and PCA3 and the additional value of both were explored. RESULTS: Tumor detection rate (49 men, mean PSA 10 ng/ml, lesion size 40 mm(2)) was 45 % (22/49 patients). In the subgroup of PI-RADS IV°, 17/17 patients had PC; in PI-RADS III° (intermediate) 5/15 had PC, and all 5 had a PCA3 > 35. PCA3 > 35 had no additional prognostic value in the whole cohort. Out of the 10/15 PC negative patients (PI-RADS III°), PCA3 was < 35 in 6. The inclusion of PCA3 value in PI-RADS III° patients improved predictive accuracy to 91.8 %. CONCLUSION: MpMRI and subsequent grading to PI-RADS significantly improves PC detection in the re-biopsy setting. The diagnostic uncertainty in the PI-RADS intermediate group can be ameliorated by the addition of PCA3 cutoff of 35 to avoid potential unnecessary biopsies.
PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) improves diagnostic accuracy in re-biopsies of men with prostate cancer (PC) suspicion, but predictive value is limited despite the use of the new Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). Prognostic value of the PC-specific biomarker prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) added to the PI-RADS score was evaluated. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of the institutional database for men with MR-guided biopsy (MR-GB) for suspicious lesion in mpMRI and who had an additional pre-MR-GB PCA3 testing for ongoing PC suspicion. All men had ≥ 1 negative ultrasound GB. Lesions were retrospectively scored by PI-RADS in three MRI sequences (T2w, DCE, and DWI). PCA3 was analyzed with cutoffs of 25 and 35. The prognostic value of mpMRI and PCA3 and the additional value of both were explored. RESULTS: Tumor detection rate (49 men, mean PSA 10 ng/ml, lesion size 40 mm(2)) was 45 % (22/49 patients). In the subgroup of PI-RADS IV°, 17/17 patients had PC; in PI-RADS III° (intermediate) 5/15 had PC, and all 5 had a PCA3 > 35. PCA3 > 35 had no additional prognostic value in the whole cohort. Out of the 10/15 PC negative patients (PI-RADS III°), PCA3 was < 35 in 6. The inclusion of PCA3 value in PI-RADS III° patients improved predictive accuracy to 91.8 %. CONCLUSION: MpMRI and subsequent grading to PI-RADS significantly improves PC detection in the re-biopsy setting. The diagnostic uncertainty in the PI-RADS intermediate group can be ameliorated by the addition of PCA3 cutoff of 35 to avoid potential unnecessary biopsies.
Authors: Alexandre de la Taille; Jacques Irani; Markus Graefen; Felix Chun; Theo de Reijke; Paul Kil; Paolo Gontero; Alain Mottaz; Alexander Haese Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: L Schimmöller; M Quentin; C Arsov; R S Lanzman; A Hiester; R Rabenalt; G Antoch; P Albers; D Blondin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrew Vickers; Angel Cronin; Monique Roobol; Caroline Savage; Mari Peltola; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Fritz Schröder; Hans Lilja Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marc C Gittelman; Bernard Hertzman; James Bailen; Thomas Williams; Isaac Koziol; Ralph Jonathan Henderson; Mitchell Efros; Mohamed Bidair; John F Ward Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Osama M Zaytoun; Andrew J Stephenson; Khaled Fareed; Ahmed El-Shafei; Tianming Gao; David Levy; J Stephen Jones Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: M J Bussemakers; A van Bokhoven; G W Verhaegh; F P Smit; H F Karthaus; J A Schalken; F M Debruyne; N Ru; W B Isaacs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: S Kaufmann; J Mischinger; B Amend; S Rausch; M Adam; M Scharpf; F Fend; U Kramer; M Notohamiprodjo; K Nikolaou; A Stenzl; J Bedke; S Kruck Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tobias Hepp; Laura Kalmbach; Manuel Kolb; Petros Martirosian; Tom Hilbert; Wolfgang M Thaiss; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Jens Bedke; Konstantin Nikolaou; Arnulf Stenzl; Stephan Kruck; Sascha Kaufmann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Joseph M Norris; Benjamin S Simpson; Marina A Parry; Clare Allen; Rhys Ball; Alex Freeman; Daniel Kelly; Hyung L Kim; Alex Kirkham; Sungyong You; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Hayley C Whitaker; Mark Emberton Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2020-07