Literature DB >> 26171803

Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Michael L Blute1, E Jason Abel1, Tracy M Downs1, Frederick Kelcz2, David F Jarrard1.   

Abstract

No guidelines currently exist that address the need for rebiopsy in patients with a negative diagnosis of prostate cancer on initial biopsy sample analysis. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer in these patients is often complicated by continued elevation of serum PSA levels that are suggestive of prostate cancer, resulting in a distinct management challenge. Following negative initial findings of biopsy sample analysis, total serum PSA levels and serum PSA kinetics are ineffective indicators of a need for a repeat biopsy; therefore, patients suspected of having prostate cancer might undergo several unnecessary biopsy procedures. Several alternative strategies exist for identifying men who might be at risk of prostate cancer despite negative findings of biopsy sample analysis. Use of other serum PSA-related measurements enables more sensitive and specific diagnosis and can be combined with knowledge of clinicopathological features to improve outcomes. Other options include the FDA-approved Progensa(®) test and prostate imaging using MRI. Newer tissue-based assays that measure methylation changes in normal prostate tissue are currently being developed. A cost-effective strategy is proposed in order to address this challenging clinical scenario, and potential directions of future studies in this area are also described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26171803     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  75 in total

1.  PCA3 score and prostate cancer diagnosis at repeated saturation biopsy. Which cut-off: 20 or 35?

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Filippo Fraggetta; Antonio Galia; Giorgio Skonieczny; Francesco Aragona
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  PCA3 molecular urine test as a predictor of repeat prostate biopsy outcome in men with previous negative biopsies: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Marc C Gittelman; Bernard Hertzman; James Bailen; Thomas Williams; Isaac Koziol; Ralph Jonathan Henderson; Mitchell Efros; Mohamed Bidair; John F Ward
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome in populations at risk: validation in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE trial.

Authors:  Sheila M J Aubin; Jennifer Reid; Mark J Sarno; Amy Blase; Jacqueline Aussie; Harry Rittenhouse; Roger Rittmaster; Gerald L Andriole; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Arun Sreekumar; Laila M Poisson; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Amjad P Khan; Qi Cao; Jindan Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Rohit Mehra; Robert J Lonigro; Yong Li; Mukesh K Nyati; Aarif Ahsan; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Bo Han; Xuhong Cao; Jaeman Byun; Gilbert S Omenn; Debashis Ghosh; Subramaniam Pennathur; Danny C Alexander; Alvin Berger; Jeffrey R Shuster; John T Wei; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Christopher Beecher; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session.

Authors:  Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makoto Ohori; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Mithat Gonen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Clinical utility of the prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) urine assay in Japanese men undergoing prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Atsushi Ochiai; Koji Okihara; Kazumi Kamoi; Takehiro Oikawa; Toru Shimazui; Shin-Ichiro Murayama; Kyoichi Tomita; Tohru Umekawa; Hirotsugu Uemura; Tsuneharu Miki
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Repeat transrectal prostate biopsies in diagnosing prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ivan V Bakardzhiev; Ivan D Dechev; Thilo Wenig; Nonka G Mateva; Mladena M Mladenova
Journal:  Folia Med (Plovdiv)       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun

10.  Evaluation of percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; R L Wolfert; T J Wang; H G Rittenhouse; T L Ratliff; R B Nadler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M L Blute; J M Shiau; M Truong; Fangfang Shi; E J Abel; T M Downs; D F Jarrard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  MicroRNA-410-5p as a potential serum biomarker for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jiaqi Wang; Huamao Ye; Dandan Zhang; Yijun Hu; Xiya Yu; Long Wang; Changjing Zuo; Yongwei Yu; Guixia Xu; Shanrong Liu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  Biomarker potential of ST6GALNAC3 and ZNF660 promoter hypermethylation in prostate cancer tissue and liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Christa Haldrup; Anne L Pedersen; Nadia Øgaard; Siri H Strand; Søren Høyer; Michael Borre; Torben F Ørntoft; Karina D Sørensen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Establishing a novel prediction model for improving the positive rate of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Deyun Shen; Lei Yuan; Ailiang Zeng; Kaiguo Xia; Bin Li; Qingyu Ge; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

Review 5.  Approaches to urinary detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jillian N Eskra; Daniel Rabizadeh; Christian P Pavlovich; William J Catalona; Jun Luo
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Validation of an epigenetic field of susceptibility to detect significant prostate cancer from non-tumor biopsies.

Authors:  Bing Yang; Tyler Etheridge; Johnathon McCormick; Adam Schultz; Tariq A Khemees; Nathan Damaschke; Glen Leverson; Kaitlin Woo; Geoffrey A Sonn; Eric A Klein; Mike Fumo; Wei Huang; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  Affinity Captured Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Provide mRNA and miRNA Biomarkers for Improved Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Detection: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michelle Davey; Sami Benzina; Marc Savoie; Guy Breault; Anirban Ghosh; Rodney J Ouellette
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Site-Specific Intact N-Linked Glycopeptide Characterization of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen from Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Stephen Mackay; Naomi L Hitefield; Ian O Oduor; Autumn B Roberts; Tanya C Burch; Raymond S Lance; Tina D Cunningham; Dean A Troyer; Oliver J Semmes; Julius O Nyalwidhe
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-08-18

9.  Alterations in expressed prostate secretion-urine PSA N-glycosylation discriminate prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia.

Authors:  Gaozhen Jia; Zhenyang Dong; Chenxia Sun; Fuping Wen; Haifeng Wang; Huaizu Guo; Xu Gao; Chuanliang Xu; Chuanliang Xu; Chenghua Yang; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-16

Review 10.  On the Road to Accurate Protein Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current Status and Future Advances.

Authors:  Yiwu Yan; Su Yeon Yeon; Chen Qian; Sungyong You; Wei Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.