Literature DB >> 24078482

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the cortical motor areas in three cases of cerebellar ataxia.

Nicolò Gabriele Pozzi, Brigida Minafra, Roberta Zangaglia, Roberto De Marzi, Giorgio Sandrini, Alberto Priori, Claudio Pacchetti.   

Abstract

The excitability of the motor areas of the cerebral cortex is reduced in ataxia. Since transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique able to increase the cortical excitability, we assessed the effect of anodal tDCS over the motor cortex in three patients with ataxia. A clinical evaluation, a video-taped SARA rating scale and a gait analysis with cinematic parameters, were performed pre- and post-sham and anodal tDCS cycle. The full cycle was composed by five consecutive constant current sessions of stimulation. Anodal tDCS (2.0 mA, 20 min,max current density: 0.0278 mA/cm2, max total charge:0.033 C/cm2) was performed on the M1 area of the most affected side. The contralateral primary motor cortex underwent cathodal stimulation (2.0 mA, 20 min, max current density:0.0278 mA/cm2, max total charge: 0.033 C/cm2). After anodal tDCS, gait analysis revealed an improvement of the symmetry of step execution and reduction of base-width lasting 30 days associated to patients’ perception of amelioration. No relevant changes were found after sham stimulation. Our results suggest tDCS can improve gait symmetry in patients with ataxia for a short-term period. Future researches are needed in order to standardize time, amplitude, and area of stimulation in order to reach a long lasting effect on cerebellar ataxia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24078482     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0524-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  20 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  RELATION BETWEEN THE SIZE AND FORM OF POTENTIALS EVOKED BY SENSORY STIMULATION AND THE BACKGROUND ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF THE RAT.

Authors:  L J BINDMAN; O C LIPPOLD; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Mark Hallett; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  G Ardolino; B Bossi; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  A Priori; A Berardelli; S Rona; N Accornero; M Manfredi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-07-13       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Pascal Giraux; Agnes Floel; Wan-Hsun Wu; Christian Gerloff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; K Fricke; U Henschke; A Schlitterlau; D Liebetanz; N Lang; S Henning; F Tergau; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Interhemispheric control of unilateral movement.

Authors:  Vincent Beaulé; Sara Tremblay; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to the Right Cerebellar Hemisphere Affects Motor Adaptation During Gait.

Authors:  Lara Fernandez; Natalia Albein-Urios; Melissa Kirkovski; Jennifer L McGinley; Anna T Murphy; Christian Hyde; Mark A Stokes; Nicole J Rinehart; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation and transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation as innovative tools for neuroscientists.

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Matteo Ciocca; Marta Parazzini; Maurizio Vergari; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.

Authors:  Thomas Hulst; Liane John; Michael Küper; Jos N van der Geest; Sophia L Göricke; Opher Donchin; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Current and emerging treatment modalities for spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Shaila D Ghanekar; Sheng-Han Kuo; Joseph S Staffetti; Theresa A Zesiewicz
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.287

6.  Cerebellar tDCS as Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxias.

Authors:  Natale Maiorana; Matteo Guidetti; Michelangelo Dini; Alberto Priori; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 7.  Restoring cognitive functions using non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in patients with cerebellar disorders.

Authors:  Paul A Pope; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on grip force control in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Liane John; Michael Küper; Thomas Hulst; Dagmar Timmann; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2017-09-15

9.  Marked reduction of cerebellar deficits in upper limbs following transcranial cerebello-cerebral DC stimulation: tremor reduction and re-programming of the timing of antagonist commands.

Authors:  Giuliana Grimaldi; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Mario Manto; Florian Bodranghien
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-30

10.  The Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cerebellar Ataxia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany X Chen; Chen-Ya Yang; Gloria Willson; Chih-Chun Lin; Sheng-Han Kuo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.