Literature DB >> 16037080

Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain.

G Ardolino1, B Bossi, S Barbieri, A Priori.   

Abstract

Although cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) decreases cortical excitability, the mechanisms underlying DC-induced changes remain largely unclear. In this study we investigated the effect of cathodal DC stimulation on spontaneous neural activity and on motor responses evoked by stimulation of the central and peripheral nervous system. We studied 17 healthy volunteers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) of the motor area were used to study the effects of cathodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 10 min) on resting motor threshold and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). The electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to cathodal tDCS was analysed by power spectral density (PSD). Motor axonal excitability changes in response to transcutaneous DC stimulation of the ulnar nerve (0.3 mA, 10 min) were assessed by testing changes in the size of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) elicited by submaximal nerve stimulation. Cathodal tDCS over the motor area for 10 min increased the motor threshold and decreased the size of MEPs evoked by TMS for at least 60 min after current offset (t(0) 71.7 +/- 5%, t(20) 50.8 +/- 11%, t(40) 47.7 +/- 7.7%, and t(60) 39.7 +/- 6.4%, P < 0.01). The tDCS also significantly decreased the size of MEPs elicited by TES (t(0) 64 +/- 16.4%, P = 0.09; t(20) 67.6 +/- 10.8%, P = 0.06; and t(40) 58.3 +/- 9.9%, P < 0.05). At the same time in the EEG the power of delta (2-4 Hz) and theta (4-7 Hz) rhythms increased (delta 181.1 +/- 40.2, P < 0.05; and theta 138.7 +/- 27.6, P = 0.07). At the peripheral level cathodal DC stimulation increased the size of the ulnar nerve CMAP (175 +/- 34.3%, P < 0.05). Our findings demonstrate that the after-effects of tDCS have a non-synaptic mechanism of action based upon changes in neural membrane function. These changes apart from reflecting local changes in ionic concentrations, could arise from alterations in transmembrane proteins and from electrolysis-related changes in [H(+)] induced by exposure to constant electric field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037080      PMCID: PMC1474743          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  36 in total

1.  Effects of membrane polarization and ischaemia on the excitability properties of human motor axons.

Authors:  M C Kiernan; H Bostock
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Responses of human sensory and motor axons to the release of ischaemia and to hyperpolarizing currents.

Authors:  Cindy S-Y Lin; Satoshi Kuwabara; Cecilia Cappelen-Smith; David Burke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Depolarization-induced long-term depression at hippocampal mossy fiber-CA3 pyramidal neuron synapses.

Authors:  Saobo Lei; Kenneth A Pelkey; Lisa Topolnik; Patrice Congar; Jean-Claude Lacaille; Chris J McBain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Localization of ionotropic glutamate receptors in peripheral axons of human skin.

Authors:  I Kinkelin; E B Bröcker; M Koltzenburg; S M Carlton
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Dextromethorphan blocks N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced currents and voltage-operated inward currents in cultured cortical neurons.

Authors:  R Netzer; P Pflimlin; G Trube
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-07-20       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Edina T Varga; Tamas Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  113 in total

1.  Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions: cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness.

Authors:  Roberta Ferrucci; Gaia Giannicola; Manuela Rosa; Manuela Fumagalli; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Mark Hallett; Stefano Zago; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-11-14

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions.

Authors:  Yves Vandermeeren; Jacques Jamart; Michel Ossemann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.288

4.  Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: A review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches.

Authors:  Soroush Zaghi; Nikolas Heine; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009-08

Review 5.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans.

Authors:  Florian Herpich; Michael D Melnick; Sara Agosta; Krystel R Huxlin; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.

Authors:  Neri Accornero; Pietro Li Voti; Maurizio La Riccia; Bruno Gregori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Short and long duration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the human hand motor area.

Authors:  Toshiaki Furubayashi; Yasuo Terao; Noritoshi Arai; Shingo Okabe; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Ritsuko Hanajima; Masashi Hamada; Akihiro Yugeta; Satomi Inomata-Terada; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Determination of zeta-potential in rat organotypic hippocampal cultures.

Authors:  Yifat Guy; Mats Sandberg; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.