Literature DB >> 15634731

Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

Friedhelm Hummel1, Pablo Celnik, Pascal Giraux, Agnes Floel, Wan-Hsun Wu, Christian Gerloff, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of adult motor disability. Despite recent progress, recovery of motor function after stroke is usually incomplete. This double blind, Sham-controlled, crossover study was designed to test the hypothesis that non-invasive stimulation of the motor cortex could improve motor function in the paretic hand of patients with chronic stroke. Hand function was measured using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT), a widely used, well validated test for functional motor assessment that reflects activities of daily living. JTT measured in the paretic hand improved significantly with non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), but not with Sham, an effect that outlasted the stimulation period, was present in every single patient tested and that correlated with an increment in motor cortical excitability within the affected hemisphere, expressed as increased recruitment curves (RC) and reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition. These results document a beneficial effect of non-invasive cortical stimulation on a set of hand functions that mimic activities of daily living in the paretic hand of patients with chronic stroke, and suggest that this interventional strategy in combination with customary rehabilitative treatments may play an adjuvant role in neurorehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15634731     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  348 in total

1.  Strategies for early stroke recovery: what lies ahead?

Authors:  Tomoko Kitago; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-01

2.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on patients with brain injury and Dysphagia.

Authors:  Leesuk Kim; Min Ho Chun; Bo Ryun Kim; Sook Joung Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rafael Polanía; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Kenneth A Weber; James W Stinear
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Swallowing Function and Quality of Life of Post-stroke Patients.

Authors:  Nezehat Özgül Ünlüer; Çağrı Mesut Temuçin; Numan Demir; Selen Serel Arslan; Aynur Ayşe Karaduman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Brain-machine interfaces and transcranial stimulation: future implications for directing functional movement and improving function after spinal injury in humans.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

9.  Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke.

Authors:  Navid Khodaparast; Seth A Hays; Andrew M Sloan; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 10.  The epigenetics of stroke recovery and rehabilitation: from polycomb to histone deacetylases.

Authors:  Jessica Elder; Mar Cortes; Avrielle Rykman; Justin Hill; Saravanan Karuppagounder; Dylan Edwards; Rajiv R Ratan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.