Literature DB >> 28469001

Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.

Thomas Hulst1,2, Liane John3, Michael Küper3, Jos N van der Geest4, Sophia L Göricke5, Opher Donchin6, Dagmar Timmann3.   

Abstract

Several studies have identified transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a potential tool in the rehabilitation of cerebellar disease. Here, we tested whether tDCS could alleviate motor impairments of subjects with cerebellar degeneration. Three groups took part in this study: 20 individuals with cerebellar degeneration, 20 age-matched controls, and 30 young controls. A standard reaching task with force-field perturbations was used to compare motor adaptation among groups and to measure the effect of stimulation of the cerebellum or primary motor cortex (M1). Cerebellar subjects and age-matched controls were tested during each stimulation type (cerebellum, M1, and sham) with a break of 1 wk among each of the three sessions. Young controls were tested during one session under one of three stimulation types (anodal cerebellum, cathodal cerebellum, or sham). As expected, individuals with cerebellar degeneration had a reduced ability to adapt to motor perturbations. Importantly, cerebellar patients did not benefit from anodal stimulation of the cerebellum or M1. Furthermore, no stimulation effects could be detected in aging and young controls. The present null results cannot exclude more subtle tDCS effects in larger subject populations and between-subject designs. Moreover, it is still possible that tDCS affects motor adaptation in cerebellar subjects and control subjects under a different task or with alternative stimulation parameters. However, for tDCS to become a valuable tool in the neurorehabilitation of cerebellar disease, stimulation effects should be present in group sizes commonly used in this rare patient population and be more consistent and predictable across subjects and tasks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been identified as a potential tool in the rehabilitation of cerebellar disease. We investigated whether tDCS of the cerebellum and primary motor cortex could alleviate motor impairments of subjects with cerebellar degeneration. The present study did not find stimulation effects of tDCS in young controls, aging controls, and individuals with cerebellar degeneration during reach adaptation. Our results require a re-evaluation of the clinical potential of tDCS in cerebellar patients.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellar degeneration; motor adaptation; rehabilitation; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28469001      PMCID: PMC5539455          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00808.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

1.  Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization.

Authors:  Jun Izawa; Tushar Rane; Opher Donchin; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Timothy Hunter; Paul Sacco; Michael A Nitsche; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Motor learning in patients with cerebellar dysfunction.

Authors:  J N Sanes; B Dimitrov; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation effects on saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Eric Avila; Jos N van der Geest; Sandra Kengne Kamga; M Claire Verhage; Opher Donchin; Maarten A Frens
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 8.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Giuliana Grimaldi; Georgios P Argyropoulos; Amy Bastian; Mar Cortes; Nicholas J Davis; Dylan J Edwards; Roberta Ferrucci; Felipe Fregni; Joseph M Galea; Masahi Hamada; Mario Manto; R Chris Miall; Leon Morales-Quezada; Paul A Pope; Alberto Priori; John Rothwell; S Paul Tomlinson; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  No consistent effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Roya Jalali; R Chris Miall; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Formation of cortical plasticity in older adults following tDCS and motor training.

Authors:  Alicia M Goodwill; John Reynolds; Robin M Daly; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 5.750

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Current and emerging treatment modalities for spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Shaila D Ghanekar; Sheng-Han Kuo; Joseph S Staffetti; Theresa A Zesiewicz
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 3.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements.

Authors:  Matthew Weightman; John-Stuart Brittain; R Chris Miall; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on grip force control in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Liane John; Michael Küper; Thomas Hulst; Dagmar Timmann; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2017-09-15

6.  Cerebellar anodal tDCS increases implicit learning when strategic re-aiming is suppressed in sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Stephan Riek; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Nitika Kumari; Denise Taylor; Nada Signal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Lack of effects of a single session of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a dynamic balance task.

Authors:  K M Steiner; W Thier; G Batsikadze; N Ludolph; W Ilg; D Timmann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nitika Kumari; Denise Taylor; Usman Rashid; Alain C Vandal; Paul F Smith; Nada Signal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The role of the cerebellum in degenerative ataxias and essential tremor: Insights from noninvasive modulation of cerebellar activity.

Authors:  Roderick P P W M Maas; Rick C G Helmich; Bart P C van de Warrenburg
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 10.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.