Literature DB >> 27648482

Microcalcification on mammography: approaches to interpretation and biopsy.

Louise Wilkinson1,2,3, Val Thomas1,2,3, Nisha Sharma1,2,3.   

Abstract

This article discusses the significance of microcalcifications on mammography and the changes in technology that have influenced management; it also describes a pragmatic approach to investigation of microcalcification in a UK screening programme.

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27648482      PMCID： PMC5605030          DOI： 10.1259/bjr.20160594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN： 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  34 in total

1.  Highlights from the history of mammography.

Authors:  R H Gold; L W Bassett; B E Widoff
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Effect of transition to digital mammography on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine G Glynn; Dione M Farria; Barbara S Monsees; Jennifer T Salcman; Kimberly N Wiele; Charles F Hildebolt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Stereotaxic instrument for needle biopsy of the mamma.

Authors:  J Bolmgren; B Jacobson; B Nordenström
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Magnus A McGee; Maureen G C Gillan; Caroline R M Boggis; Pamela M Griffiths; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result.

Authors:  R Warren; P Allgood; G Hunnam; S Godward; S Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Adriana M J Bluekens; Roland Holland; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Predictors of pain experienced by women during percutaneous imaging-guided breast biopsies.

Authors:  Adrianne E Soo; Rebecca A Shelby; Lauren S Miller; Melissa Hayes Balmadrid; Karen S Johnson; Anava A Wren; Sora C Yoon; Francis J Keefe; Mary Scott Soo
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.

Authors:  Sohi Bae; Jung Hyun Yoon; Hee Jung Moon; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.500
View more
  26 in total

1.  Correlative imaging reveals physiochemical heterogeneity of microcalcifications in human breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jennie A M R Kunitake; Siyoung Choi; Kayla X Nguyen; Meredith M Lee; Frank He; Daniel Sudilovsky; Patrick G Morris; Maxine S Jochelson; Clifford A Hudis; David A Muller; Peter Fratzl; Claudia Fischbach; Admir Masic; Lara A Estroff
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.867

Review 2.  Regulatory mechanisms and potential medical applications of HNF1A-AS1 in cancers.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jiang Shi; Junfang Luo; Cong Liu; Lixu Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Classifying presence or absence of calcifications on mammography using generative contribution mapping.

Authors:  Tatsuaki Kobayashi; Takafumi Haraguchi; Tomoharu Nagao
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-08-21

4.  Visual bias could impede diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer calcifications.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Amelia C Warden; Michael D Dodd; Elizabeth E Edney
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 5.  Learning to distinguish progressive and non-progressive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anna K Casasent; Mathilde M Almekinders; Charlotta Mulder; Proteeti Bhattacharjee; Deborah Collyar; Alastair M Thompson; Jos Jonkers; Esther H Lips; Jacco van Rheenen; E Shelley Hwang; Serena Nik-Zainal; Nicholas E Navin; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 69.800

6.  Hydroxyapatite mineral enhances malignant potential in a tissue-engineered model of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Frank He; Nora L Springer; Matthew A Whitman; Siddharth P Pathi; Yeonkyung Lee; Sunish Mohanan; Stephen Marcott; Aaron E Chiou; Bryant S Blank; Neil Iyengar; Patrick G Morris; Maxine Jochelson; Clifford A Hudis; Pragya Shah; Jennie A M R Kunitake; Lara A Estroff; Jan Lammerding; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Calling all calcifications: a retrospective case control study.

Authors:  Anand K Narayan; Delia M Keating; Elizabeth A Morris; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.605

8.  A Screening CAD Tool for the Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Mammograms.

Authors:  Vikrant A Karale; Joshua P Ebenezer; Jayasree Chakraborty; Tulika Singh; Anup Sadhu; Niranjan Khandelwal; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Spontaneously Disappearing Calcifications in the Breast: A Rare Instance Where a Decrease in Size on Mammogram Is Not Good.

Authors:  Quan D Nguyen; Nga T Nguyen; Linden Dixon; Flavia E Posleman Monetto; Angelica S Robinson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-21

10.  The predictive value of calcification for the grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Jianchun Kong; Xiaomin Liu; Xiaodan Zhang; Yu Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.