Literature DB >> 18716095

Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features.

Sughra Raza1, Monica Vallejo, Sona A Chikarmane, Robyn L Birdwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate the variety of common morphologic features, enhancement patterns, and kinetics of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast, using the American College of Radiology BI-RADS lexicon.
CONCLUSION: Breast MRI plays an important role in the detection of DCIS, which most often appears as nonmass clumped enhancement, in a ductal or segmental distribution, with variable enhancement kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716095     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Current and future applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to breast and ovarian cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jim Klostergaard; Kenia Parga; Raphael G Raptis
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

3.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Differentiation between Clinically Noninflammatory Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma in situ Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ning Qu; Yahong Luo; Tao Yu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features?

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Garima Agrawal; Muqing Lin; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Kinetic patterns of benign and malignant breast lesions on contrast enhanced digital mammogram.

Authors:  Jer-Shyung Huang; Huay-Ben Pan; Tsung-Lung Yang; Bao-Hui Hung; Chia-Ling Chiang; Meng-Yuan Tsai; Chen-Pin Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.

Authors:  Dustin Newell; Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Hon J Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Breast ductal carcinoma in situ: morphologic and kinetic MRI findings.

Authors:  Mirjan M Nadrljanski; Biljana B Marković; Zorica Č Milošević
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 0.212

Review 9.  Understanding indications and defining guidelines for breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter K Schoub
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-30

10.  Turbo Spin-echo Diffusion-weighted Imaging Compared with Single-shot Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging: Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance When Differentiating between Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoko Mori; Shunji Mugikura; Minoru Miyashita; Yu Mori; Yui Maekawa; Tatsuo Nagasaka; Kei Takase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.471

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.