| Literature DB >> 24072596 |
Alexandria C Zakrzewski1, Mariana V C Coutinho, Joseph Boomer, Barbara A Church, J David Smith.
Abstract
The behavioral uncertainty response has grounded the study of animal metacognition and influenced the study of human psychophysics. However, the interpretation of this response is debated--especially whether it is a behavioral index of metacognition. The authors advanced this interpretation using the dissociative technique of response deadlines. Uncertainty responding, if it is higher level or metacognitive, should depend on a slower, more controlled decisional process and be more vulnerable to time constraints. Humans performed sparse-uncertain-dense or sparse-middle-dense discriminations in which, respectively, they could decline difficult trials or positively identify middle stimuli. Uncertainty responses were sharply and selectively reduced under a decision deadline, as compared to primary perceptual responses (i.e., "sparse," "middle," and "dense" responses). This dissociation suggests that the uncertainty response does reflect a higher-level, decisional response. It grants the uncertainty response a distinctive psychological role in its task and encourages an interpretation of this response as an elemental behavioral index of uncertainty that deserves continuing research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24072596 PMCID: PMC3966987 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0521-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychon Bull Rev ISSN: 1069-9384