Literature DB >> 22250905

Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals.

M E Le Pelley1.   

Abstract

Monkeys will selectively and adaptively learn to avoid the most difficult trials of a perceptual discrimination learning task. Couchman, Coutinho, Beran, and Smith (2010) have recently demonstrated that this pattern of responding does not depend on animals receiving trial-by-trial feedback for their responses; it also obtains if experience of the most difficult trials occurs only under conditions of deferred feedback. Couchman et al. argued that this ruled out accounts based on low-level processes of associative learning and instead required explanation in terms of metacognitive processes of decision monitoring. Contrary to this argument, a simple associative model of reinforcement learning is shown to account for the key findings of Couchman et al.'s empirical study, along with several other findings that have previously been claimed to challenge associative models. (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22250905     DOI: 10.1037/a0026478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  37 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

3.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

6.  Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Neural networks underlying the metacognitive uncertainty response.

Authors:  Erick J Paul; J David Smith; Vivian V Valentin; Benjamin O Turner; Aron K Barbey; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Infants ask for help when they know they don't know.

Authors:  Louise Goupil; Margaux Romand-Monnier; Sid Kouider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices.

Authors:  Clint J Perry; Andrew B Barron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.