Literature DB >> 23343893

Alignment to natural and imposed mismatches between the senses.

K van der Kooij1, E Brenner, R J van Beers, W D Schot, J B J Smeets.   

Abstract

Does the nervous system continuously realign the senses so that objects are seen and felt in the same place? Conflicting answers to this question have been given. Research imposing a sensory mismatch has provided evidence that the nervous system realigns the senses to reduce the mismatch. Other studies have shown that when subjects point with the unseen hand to visual targets, their end points show visual-proprioceptive biases that do not disappear after episodes of visual feedback. These biases are indicative of intersensory mismatches that the nervous system does not align for. Here, we directly compare how the nervous system deals with natural and imposed mismatches. Subjects moved a hand-held cube to virtual cubes appearing at pseudorandom locations in three-dimensional space. We alternated blocks in which subjects moved without visual feedback of the hand with feedback blocks in which we rendered a cube representing the hand-held cube. In feedback blocks, we rotated the visual feedback by 5° relative to the subject's head, creating an imposed mismatch between vision and proprioception on top of any natural mismatches. Realignment occurred quickly but was incomplete. We found more realignment to imposed mismatches than to natural mismatches. We propose that this difference is related to the way in which the visual information changed when subjects entered the experiment: the imposed mismatches were different from the mismatch in daily life, so alignment started from scratch, whereas the natural mismatches were not imposed by the experimenter, so subjects are likely to have entered the experiment partly aligned.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343893     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00845.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visuomotor adaptation: how forgetting keeps us conservative.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Eli Brenner; Robert J van Beers; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Rewarding imperfect motor performance reduces adaptive changes.

Authors:  K van der Kooij; K E Overvliet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Proprioceptive Localization of the Hand Changes When Skin Stretch around the Elbow Is Manipulated.

Authors:  Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-21

5.  The Southampton-York Natural Scenes (SYNS) dataset: Statistics of surface attitude.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; James H Elder; Erich W Graf; Julian Leyland; Arthur J Lugtigheid; Alexander Muryy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Correcting for Visuo-Haptic Biases in 3D Haptic Guidance.

Authors:  Femke E van Beek; Irene A Kuling; Eli Brenner; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Matching locations is not just matching sensory representations.

Authors:  Irene A Kuling; Marieke C W van der Graaff; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Multimodal Sensorimotor Integration of Visual and Kinaesthetic Afferents Modulates Motor Circuits in Humans.

Authors:  Volker R Zschorlich; Frank Behrendt; Marc H E de Lussanet
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-03

9.  Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following terminal visual feedback of the hand.

Authors:  Victoria Barkley; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Temporally stable adaptation is robust, incomplete and specific.

Authors:  Katinka van der Kooij; Krista E Overvliet; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.