Literature DB >> 25352264

Editorial: peer review and the editorial process--a look behind the curtain.

Seth S Leopold1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25352264      PMCID： PMC4390973          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-014-4031-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up.

Authors:  R Horton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?

Authors:  Brian P Cunningham; Samuel Harmsen; Chris Kweon; Jason Patterson; Robert Waldrop; Alex McLaren; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

Authors:  D A Kronick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Editorial: Let's talk about Level IV: The bones of a good retrospective case series.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  S N Goodman; J Berlin; S W Fletcher; R H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  J C Roberts; R H Fletcher; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Authors:  Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial.

Authors:  E Cobo; J Cortés; J M Ribera; F Cardellach; A Selva-O'Callaghan; B Kostov; L García; L Cirugeda; D G Altman; J A González; J A Sànchez; F Miras; A Urrutia; V Fonollosa; C Rey-Joly; M Vilardell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-22

9.  Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Debra Houry; Steven Green; Michael Callaham
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.463
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Editorial: Can Journals, as Trusted Intermediaries, Cut Through the Signal-to-Noise Problem in Medical Publishing?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.