Literature DB >> 19148335

Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

M A G van der Heyden1, T van de Ven, T Opthof.   

Abstract

Scientific misconduct and fraud occur in science. The (anonymous) peer review process serves as goalkeeper of scientific quality rather than scientific integrity. In this brief paper we describe some limitations of the peer-review process. We describe the catastrophic facts of the 'Woo-Suk Hwang fraud case' and raise some ethical concerns about the issue. Finally, we pay attention to plagiarism, autoplagiarism and double publications. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:25-9.).

Keywords:  double publications; fraud; peer review; plagiarism; scientific misconduct; stem cell research

Year:  2009        PMID： 19148335      PMCID： PMC2626656          DOI： 10.1007/BF03086211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN： 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  40 in total

Review 1.  The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias.

Authors:  Tobias Opthof; Ruben Coronel; Michiel J Janse
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Abnormal beta-catenin and reduced axin expression are associated with poor differentiation and progression in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Xu; Liang Wang; Dong Lin; Yang Liu; Nan Liu; Xi-Ming Yuan; En-Hua Wang
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Asia on the rise.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Research misconduct. Seoul National University dismisses Hwang.

Authors:  Yvette Wohn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Copycat trap.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Can the quality of peer review be measured?

Authors:  J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Temporal effects of alpha-tocopherol and L-ascorbic acid on in vitro fertilized porcine embryo development.

Authors:  Mohammad Shamim Hossein; Md Abul Hashem; Yeon Woo Jeong; Myeong Seop Lee; Sue Kim; Ji Hye Kim; Ok Jae Koo; Seon Mi Park; Eu Gine Lee; Sun Woo Park; Sung Keun Kang; Byeong Chun Lee; Woo Suk Hwang
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 2.145

8.  Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells.

Authors:  Byeong Chun Lee; Min Kyu Kim; Goo Jang; Hyun Ju Oh; Fibrianto Yuda; Hye Jin Kim; M Shamim Hossein; M Hossein Shamim; Jung Ju Kim; Sung Keun Kang; Gerald Schatten; Woo Suk Hwang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Characterization of porcine growth differentiation factor-9 and its expression in oocyte maturation.

Authors:  Gab Sang Lee; Hye Soo Kim; Woo Suk Hwang; Sang Hwan Hyun
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  Molecular genetics: DNA analysis of a putative dog clone.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Leonid Kruglyak; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962
View more
  12 in total

1.  Eyes wide open: reader and author responsibility in understanding the limits of peer review.

Authors:  P J Benson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The Cost of Scientific Misconduct.

Authors:  Carine Tarazi
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists: The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology.

Authors:  T Opthof; A A M Wilde
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

Authors:  M A G van der Heyden; T van de Ven; T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Inflation of impact factors by journal self-citation in cardiovascular science.

Authors:  T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  On (scientific) integrity: conceptual clarification.

Authors:  Maria do Céu Patrão Neves
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-06

7.  Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.

Authors:  S P J M Horbach; W Halffman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  The 1-h fraud detection challenge.

Authors:  Marcel A G van der Heyden
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Knowledge and Perception about Clinical Research Shapes Behavior: Face to Face Survey in Korean General Public.

Authors:  Yun Jung Choi; Sung-Ho Beck; Woon Yong Kang; Soyoung Yoo; Seong-Yoon Kim; Ji Sung Lee; Tal Burt; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.

Authors:  David Robert Grimes; Chris T Bauch; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.963
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.