Literature DB >> 26724808

Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.

David J Hak1, Peter Giannoudis2, Cyril Mauffrey3.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26724808     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1735-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

Authors:  D A Kronick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?

Authors:  José G B Derraik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.

Authors:  Cenyu Shen; Bo-Christer Björk
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.

Authors:  Maurício Cantor; Shane Gero
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reviews, reviewers and reviewing.

Authors:  Ancuţa Zazgyva; Elizaveta Kon; Cyril Mauffrey; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.