Literature DB >> 16741499

Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review.

Les Grivell1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16741499      PMCID： PMC1479585          DOI： 10.1038/sj.embor.7400718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.

Authors:  David Colquhoun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The politics of publication.

Authors:  Peter A Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The history of the peer-review process.

Authors:  Ray Spier
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Authors, reviewers and editors at The EMBO Journal.

Authors:  Pernille Rørth
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

Authors:  D A Kronick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F Godlee; C R Gale; C N Martyn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Peer review: reform or revolution?

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-27

9.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

Review 10.  Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.

Authors:  T Jefferson; M Rudin; S Brodney Folse; F Davidoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18
View more
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review of peer review for scientific manuscripts.

Authors:  Bradley P Larson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 2.  A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?

Authors:  Kuan-Teh Jeang
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.602
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.