Literature DB >> 27692398

New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Ivaylo B Mihaylov1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medical images are more than pictures. They contain additional quantitative information which can be interrogated, quantified, and utilized. Besides anatomical information computed tomography (CT) imaging data provide electron density information. Radiotherapy use of this density information is limited to its application only in dose calculations. The direct product of dose, density, and volume forms a quantity called integral dose. The integral dose delivered to a volume of interest is the total energy deposited in that volume. Here it is hypothesized that minimization of the integral dose is advantageous in radiotherapy planning. The purpose of this work is to study the incorporation of quantitative imaging information in radiotherapy inverse optimization through total energy minimization (Energy hereafter).
DESIGN: Twenty lung patient plans were studied. For each patient density was quantified on voxel-by-voxel basis through image gray value-to-density conversion curves. Energy-based objective function was used for inverse radiotherapy plan optimization. The obtained plans were evaluated in the light of current standard of care, based on dose-volume (DVH) optimization approach.
RESULTS: The statistical significance analyses of the results indicated that the doses to normal tissue were between 14% and 45% lower, when Energy-based optimization was used instead of DVH-based optimization.
CONCLUSION: Incorporation of quantitative imaging information, through CT derived density, in the optimization cost function allows reduction of dose to normal tissue for NSCLC cases. Energy-based radiotherapy plans result in lower normal tissue dose and potentially lower complication rates compared to standard of care. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy; IMRT; Lung; Mass; Optimization; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692398      PMCID: PMC5136503          DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  38 in total

1.  Breathing-synchronized radiotherapy program at the University of California Davis Cancer Center.

Authors:  H D Kubo; P M Len; S Minohara; H Mostafavi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system.

Authors:  Q Wu; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; C Burman; L Brewster; M Goitein; R Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Dose-mass inverse optimization for minimally moving thoracic lesions.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; E G Moros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A computer-controlled radiation therapy machine for pelvic and para-aortic nodal areas.

Authors:  L M Chin; P k Kijewski; G K Svensson; J T Chaffey; M B Levene; B E Bjärngard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations in the liver: sensitivity to variations in motion.

Authors:  Anthony E Lujan; James M Balter; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Quantification of the skin sparing effect achievable with high-energy photon beams when carbon fiber tables are used.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov; Jose Penagaricano; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Burman; C S Chui; G Kutcher; S Leibel; M Zelefsky; T LoSasso; S Spirou; Q Wu; J Yang; J Stein; R Mohan; Z Fuks; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.

Authors:  Stephen Jones; Matthew Williams
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  W D Travis; L B Travis; S S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.