Literature DB >> 29218404

The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?

Martin Schoenthaler1, Simon Hein1, Christian Seitz2, Christian Türk3, Hansjörg Danuser4, Werner Vach5, Arkadiusz Miernik6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the current treatment strategies of LRS in German-speaking Europe. Little is known about the treatment of large renal stones (LRS > 3 cm) in daily urological practice. LRS therapy can be, however, challenging and hazardous.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 39 item web-based survey was performed among urologists listed by the German, Austrian and Swiss Associations of Urology, addressing professionals treating LRS "on their own" and working in a German-speaking country. Uniparametric descriptions indicated as absolute numbers and percentages without p values, simple linear associations and bubble plots without arithmetic means or bar charts with standard deviation between targeted parameters and percentages were used.
RESULTS: 266 of the 6586 responding urologists claimed to treat urinary stones on a regular basis. The majority of them were male (90.2%) and over 50 years old (42.9%). Most stones are treated in non-university hospitals (69.5%). 81.9% of all the institutions treat more than 150 cases/y. Open surgery is still performed in 45.5% of the centres, laparoscopy in 32%. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the primary treatment option. Antimicrobial strategies vary considerably. Serious complications seem to be rare. However, quite a few responders reported treatment-related deaths. The main limitation is the absolute number of urologists performing LRS treatment, which is unknown.
CONCLUSIONS: The German-speaking urologist treating LRS is a male and over 50. Although he performs PNL primarily, he is not averse to open surgery and SWL. He applies guidelines and employs modern equipment. Only antimicrobial strategies are out of line with the international standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endourology; Kidney stones; Stone treatment; Urolithiasis; Web-based survey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29218404     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2148-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nihat Karakoyunlu; Goksel Goktug; Nevzat Can Şener; Kursad Zengin; Ismail Nalbant; Ufuk Ozturk; Ugur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  A bibliometric evaluation of publications in urological journals among European Union countries between 2000-2005.

Authors:  Beibei Oelrich; Robert Peters; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  The emerging role of robotics and laparoscopy in stone disease.

Authors:  Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; David Urbach; Muhammad Mamdani; Refik Saskin; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  'Mini, ultra, micro' - nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques.

Authors:  Anna Wright; Nick Rukin; Daron Smith; Jean De la Rosette; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-11-26

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United kingdom: results of a prospective data registry.

Authors:  James N Armitage; Stuart O Irving; Neil A Burgess
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.

Authors:  Attasit Srisubat; Somkiat Potisat; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Vasun Setthawong; Malinee Laopaiboon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-24

Review 8.  Economics and cost of care of stone disease.

Authors:  Yair Lotan
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 9.  Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones?

Authors:  Gerasimos Alivizatos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 10.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.