Literature DB >> 18007146

Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancer.

Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker1, Herman F J ten Kroode, Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis, Jan van den Bout, Margreet G E M Ausems.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about reasons why eligible breast cancer patients decline BRCA mutation testing. They may withdraw at different stages during genetic counseling for different reasons. We prospectively studied perceived benefits and barriers to genetic counseling and BRCA testing in 102 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients approached for genetic counseling at the start of radiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients completed questionnaires and participated in interviews at different stages of the counseling protocol.
RESULTS: Participation was not influenced by distress, knowledge about hereditary breast cancer, previous genetic testing in relatives, or perceived risks and barriers. Immediate decliners (n = 23) do not believe genetic testing is relevant for them. Patients who decline after pedigree compilation (n = 14) are more hesitant and anxious about the influence of the test result on their future often wishing to postpone further testing. Late decliners (n = 7) withdraw afraid of the test result and/or after a relative's objection. These decliners are not easily identified upon approach because they are similar to patients who receive a DNA test result (n = 58). Notwithstanding their decline, 81% agreed to the timing or would have preferred an earlier approach for genetic counseling.
CONCLUSION: Decliners may make more informed decisions after tailored health education, including adequate risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18007146     DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318159a318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  36 in total

Review 1.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Cancer Survivorship Care: An Opportunity to Revisit Cancer Genetics.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Betsy C Risendal; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Karen Hurley; Mary B Daly; Andrew Godwin; Joanne S Buzaglo; Kuang-Yi Wen
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-14

4.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved?

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Valentina Bigazzi; Carlo Leone; Gabriella Maggi; Aline Martayan; Fabio M Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Are we being overly cautious? A qualitative inquiry into the experiences and perceptions of treatment-focused germline BRCA genetic testing amongst women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  E Zilliacus; B Meiser; M Gleeson; K Watts; K Tucker; E A Lobb; G Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic Counseling Referral Rates in Long-Term Survivors of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Maryam N Shafaee; Arup K Sinha; Akshara Raghavendra; Babita Saigal; Rashmi K Murthy; Ashley H Woodson; Banu Arun
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 10.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.