Literature DB >> 15131408

Health economics and genetic service development: a familial cancer genetic example.

David Cohen1, Garry Barton, Jonathon Gray, Kate Brain.   

Abstract

Advances in genetics are allowing a greater number of clinical genetics services to be offered to individuals with family histories of particular diseases. It is important that such services are not allowed to proliferate before they have been properly evaluated in terms of both their clinical and cost-effectiveness. A randomised controlled study of a new clinical genetics service in Wales for women with a family history of breast cancer has been undertaken. The health service costs from initial consultation and counselling through to mutation testing within families were assessed, along with patient travel costs. The extra cost of specialist genetics assessment (intervention) was pound 16.36 higher per woman than assessment by a breast surgeon at a District General Hospital (control). A further cost of pound 46.42 per initially presenting woman was also generated as a result of further counselling within the families of 48, and testing within the families of 36 of the 412 original presenting women. An explanation is given here of the costing methodology as an illustration of what is involved in such an exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131408     DOI: 10.1023/B:FAME.0000026812.87551.bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  13 in total

1.  A model protocol evaluating the introduction of genetic assessment for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Gray; K Brain; P Norman; C Anglim; L France; G Barton; L Branston; E Parsons; A Clarke; J Sampson; E Roberts; R Newcombe; D Cohen; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Familial breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; I S Fentiman; K McPherson; D Asbury; B A Ponder; A Howell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-15

4.  Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer.

Authors:  K Brain; J Gray; P Norman; E France; C Anglim; G Barton; E Parsons; A Clarke; H Sweetland; M Tischkowitz; J Myring; K Stansfield; D Webster; K Gower-Thomas; R Daoud; C Gateley; I Monypenny; H Singhal; L Branston; J Sampson; E Roberts; R Newcombe; D Cohen; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Family history and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  R W Sattin; G L Rubin; L A Webster; C M Huezo; P A Wingo; H W Ory; P M Layde
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Screening for cancer in high risk families.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 8.  Inherited susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  D Easton; D Ford; J Peto
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1993

9.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Public-private partnership as a solution for integrating genetic services into health care of countries with low and middle incomes.

Authors:  Florian Meier; Oliver Schöffski; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-05-22

2.  Identifying outcomes of clinical genetic services: qualitative evidence and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Christalla Pithara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?

Authors:  Fernando Antoñanzas; R Rodríguez-Ibeas; M F Hutter; R Lorente; C Juárez; M Pinillos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-20

4.  Reasons for adult referrals for genetic counseling at a genetics center in Izmir, Turkey: analysis of 8965 cases over an eleven-year period.

Authors:  Ozgur Cogulu; Ferda Ozkinay; Haluk Akin; Huseyin Onay; Emin Karaca; Asude Alpman Durmaz; Burak Durmaz; Ayca Aykut; Erhan Pariltay; Ozgur Kirbiyik; Cumhur Gunduz; Cihangir Ozkinay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Evaluation of group genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yolanda Ridge; Karen Panabaker; Mary McCullum; Cheryl Portigal-Todd; Jenna Scott; Barbara McGillivray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 7.  Cancer genetics services: a systematic review of the economic evidence and issues.

Authors:  G L Griffith; R T Edwards; J Gray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.