Literature DB >> 24030818

Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Curtis J Billings1, Garnett P McMillan, Tina M Penman, Sun Mi Gille.   

Abstract

Speech perception in background noise is a common challenge across individuals and health conditions (e.g., hearing impairment, aging, etc.). Both behavioral and physiological measures have been used to understand the important factors that contribute to perception-in-noise abilities. The addition of a physiological measure provides additional information about signal-in-noise encoding in the auditory system and may be useful in clarifying some of the variability in perception-in-noise abilities across individuals. Fifteen young normal-hearing individuals were tested using both electrophysiology and behavioral methods as a means to determine (1) the effects of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal level and (2) how well cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) can predict perception in noise. Three correlation/regression approaches were used to determine how well CAEPs predicted behavior. Main effects of SNR were found for both electrophysiology and speech perception measures, while signal level effects were found generally only for speech testing. These results demonstrate that when signals are presented in noise, sensitivity to SNR cues obscures any encoding of signal level cues. Electrophysiology and behavioral measures were strongly correlated. The best physiological predictors (e.g., latency, amplitude, and area of CAEP waves) of behavior (SNR at which 50 % of the sentence is understood) were N1 latency and N1 amplitude measures. In addition, behavior was best predicted by the 70-dB signal/5-dB SNR CAEP condition. It will be important in future studies to determine the relationship of electrophysiology and behavior in populations who experience difficulty understanding speech in noise such as those with hearing impairment or age-related deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030818      PMCID: PMC3825022          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0415-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  27 in total

1.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe; D M McDaniel; C A Gwaltney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control.

Authors:  O Schwartz; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: global field power and principal component analysis.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Identification of syllables in noise: electrophysiological and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Yael Henkin; Chava Muchnik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range.

Authors:  G Adler; J Adler
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1989

7.  Spike-rate intensity functions of cat cortical neurons studied with combined tone-noise stimuli.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Kelly L Tremblay; G Christopher Stecker; Wendy M Tolin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  26 in total

1.  Compensatory and Serial Processing Models for Relating Electrophysiology, Speech Understanding, and Cognition.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.

Authors:  Ingyu Chun; Curtis J Billings; Christi W Miller; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Aphasia and Auditory Processing after Stroke through an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Lens.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Iruni Wanigasekara; Oscar M Cañete; Celia Moore; Clare M McCann
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

5.  Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Casey Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Sensitivity of offset and onset cortical auditory evoked potentials to signals in noise.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.

Authors:  Kimberly A Jenkins; Calli Fodor; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Brandon M Madsen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cortical signal-in-noise coding varies by noise type, signal-to-noise ratio, age, and hearing status.

Authors:  Nashrah Maamor; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Diabetes-Associated Changes in Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Relation to Normal Aging.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Daniel McDermott; Jane Gordon; Donald Austin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.