Literature DB >> 27605531

Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Alessandro Presacco1,2, Jonathan Z Simon2,3,4,5, Samira Anderson6,2.   

Abstract

The ability to understand speech is significantly degraded by aging, particularly in noisy environments. One way that older adults cope with this hearing difficulty is through the use of contextual cues. Several behavioral studies have shown that older adults are better at following a conversation when the target speech signal has high contextual content or when the background distractor is not meaningful. Specifically, older adults gain significant benefit in focusing on and understanding speech if the background is spoken by a talker in a language that is not comprehensible to them (i.e., a foreign language). To understand better the neural mechanisms underlying this benefit in older adults, we investigated aging effects on midbrain and cortical encoding of speech when in the presence of a single competing talker speaking in a language that is meaningful or meaningless to the listener (i.e., English vs. Dutch). Our results suggest that neural processing is strongly affected by the informational content of noise. Specifically, older listeners' cortical responses to the attended speech signal are less deteriorated when the competing speech signal is an incomprehensible language rather than when it is their native language. Conversely, temporal processing in the midbrain is affected by different backgrounds only during rapid changes in speech and only in younger listeners. Additionally, we found that cognitive decline is associated with an increase in cortical envelope tracking, suggesting an age-related over (or inefficient) use of cognitive resources that may explain their difficulty in processing speech targets while trying to ignore interfering noise.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; cortex; electrophysiology; hearing; midbrain

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605531      PMCID: PMC5110638          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00373.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  82 in total

1.  Hierarchical and serial processing in the spatial auditory cortical pathway is degraded by natural aging.

Authors:  Dina L Juarez-Salinas; James R Engle; Xochi O Navarro; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neuroanatomical characteristics and speech perception in noise in older adults.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Marc Ettlinger; John P Sheppard; Geshri M Gunasekera; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Biological markers of auditory gap detection in young, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Bruce Schneider; Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt; Victoria B Gonzalez
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Sandra Weintraub; Sureyya S Dikmen; Robert K Heaton; David S Tulsky; Philip D Zelazo; Patricia J Bauer; Noelle E Carlozzi; Jerry Slotkin; David Blitz; Kathleen Wallner-Allen; Nathan A Fox; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dan Mungas; Cindy J Nowinski; Jennifer Richler; Joanne A Deocampo; Jacob E Anderson; Jennifer J Manly; Beth Borosh; Richard Havlik; Kevin Conway; Emmeline Edwards; Lisa Freund; Jonathan W King; Claudia Moy; Ellen Witt; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening.

Authors:  Gregory J H Colflesh; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

8.  Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Garnett P McMillan; Emily M Ellis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.

Authors:  Susanne Brouwer; Kristin J Van Engen; Lauren Calandruccio; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

10.  Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Siddharth Rajaram; Lenny A Varghese; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  23 in total

1.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

5.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

6.  Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.

Authors:  Kimberly A Jenkins; Calli Fodor; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Over-representation of speech in older adults originates from early response in higher order auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Acta Acust United Acust       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

9.  Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.

Authors:  Proloy Das; Christian Brodbeck; Jonathan Z Simon; Behtash Babadi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.