Literature DB >> 24030435

Minimizing liability risks under the ACMG recommendations for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Barbara J Evans1.   

Abstract

Recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) for reporting incidental findings present novel ethical and legal issues. This article expresses no views on the ethical aspects of these recommendations and focuses strictly on liability risks and how to minimize them. The recommendations place labs and clinicians in a new liability environment that exposes them to intentional tort lawsuits as well to traditional suits for negligence. Intentional tort suits are especially troubling because of their potential to inflict ruinous personal financial losses on individual clinicians and laboratory personnel. This article surveys this new liability landscape and describes analytical approaches for minimizing tort liabilities. To a considerable degree, liability risks can be controlled by structuring activities in ways that make future lawsuits nonviable before the suits ever arise. Proactive liability analysis is an effective tool for minimizing tort liabilities in connection with the testing and reporting activities that the ACMG recommends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030435      PMCID: PMC3892767          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

1.  The future of bioethics testimony: guidelines for determining qualifications, reliability, and helpfulness.

Authors:  B Spielman; G Agich
Journal:  San Diego Law Rev       Date:  1999

2.  Opportunistic testing: the death of informed consent?

Authors:  Dena S Davis
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2013

3.  A legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects?

Authors:  Matthew P Gordon
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.619

4.  Enabling responsible public genomics.

Authors:  John M Conley; Adam K Doerr; Daniel B Vorhaus
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2010

Review 5.  The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Jordan Paradise; Charlisse Caga-anan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  The Role of Law in the Debate over Return of Research Results and Incidental Findings: The Challenge of Developing Law for Translational Science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Minn J Law Sci Technol       Date:  2012

7.  Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.

Authors:  Marianna J Bledsoe; Ellen Wright Clayton; Amy L McGuire; William E Grizzle; P Pearl O'Rourke; Nikolajs Zeps
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Brittney N Crock; Brian Van Ness; Frances Lawrenz; Jeffrey P Kahn; Laura M Beskow; Mildred K Cho; Michael F Christman; Robert C Green; Ralph Hall; Judy Illes; Moira Keane; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Isaac S Kohane; Bonnie Leroy; Karen J Maschke; William McGeveran; Pilar Ossorio; Lisa S Parker; Gloria M Petersen; Henry S Richardson; Joan A Scott; Sharon F Terry; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Managing incidental genomic findings: legal obligations of clinicians.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Susanne Haga; Patricia Kuszler; Emily Bane; Krysta Shutske; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  19 in total

1.  Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.

Authors:  Marlies Saelaert; Heidi Mertes; Elfride De Baere; Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The fiduciary relationship model for managing clinical genomic "incidental" findings.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Barbara J Evans; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.908

4.  Key Expert Stakeholder Perceptions of the Law of Genomics: Identified Problems and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Fook Yee Cheung; Lauren Clatch; Susan M Wolf; Ellen Wright Clayton; Frances Lawrenz
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 5.  Living laboratory: whole-genome sequencing as a learning healthcare enterprise.

Authors:  M Angrist; L Jamal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 6.  Towards precision nephrology: the opportunities and challenges of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jordan G Nestor; Emily E Groopman; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emma R Leof; Kari G Rabe; Jennifer B McCormick; Gloria M Petersen; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Katrina A B Goddard; Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Paul S Appelbaum; Jonathan S Berg; Barbara A Bernhardt; Leslie G Biesecker; Sawona Biswas; Carrie L Blout; Kevin M Bowling; Kyle B Brothers; Wylie Burke; Charlisse F Caga-Anan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Wendy K Chung; Ellen W Clayton; Gregory M Cooper; Kelly East; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Levi A Garraway; Jeremy R Garrett; Stacy W Gray; Gail E Henderson; Lucia A Hindorff; Ingrid A Holm; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Carolyn M Hutter; Pasi A Janne; Steven Joffe; David Kaufman; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Ian D Krantz; Teri A Manolio; Laurence McCullough; Jean McEwen; Amy McGuire; Donna Muzny; Richard M Myers; Deborah A Nickerson; Jeffrey Ou; Donald W Parsons; Gloria M Petersen; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; J Scott Roberts; Dan Robinson; Joseph S Salama; Sarah Scollon; Richard R Sharp; Brian Shirts; Nancy B Spinner; Holly K Tabor; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; David L Veenstra; Nikhil Wagle; Karen Weck; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kirk Wilhelmsen; Susan M Wolf; Julia Wynn; Joon-Ho Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genomic sequencing: assessing the health care system, policy, and big-data implications.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Julia R Trosman; Robin K Kelley; Mark J Pletcher; Michael P Douglas; Christine B Weldon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.