Literature DB >> 18547206

The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.

Susan M Wolf1, Jordan Paradise, Charlisse Caga-anan.   

Abstract

Research technologies can now produce so much information that there is significant potential for incidental findings (IFs). These are findings generated in research that are beyond the aims of the study. Current law and federal regulations offer no direct guidance on how to deal with IFs in research, nor is there adequate professional or institutional guidance. We advocate a defined set of researcher duties based on law and ethics and recommend a pathway to be followed in handling IFs in research. This article traces the underlying ethical and legal theories supporting researcher duties to manage IFs, including duties to develop a plan for management in the research protocol, to discuss the possibility of and management plan for IFs in the informed consent process, and to address, evaluate, and ultimately offer to disclose IFs of potential clinical or reproductive significance to research participants when they arise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18547206      PMCID: PMC2581517          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  45 in total

Review 1.  Genetic information and testing in insurance and employment: technical, social and ethical issues.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Sandy Raeburn; Marcus Pembrey; Martin Bobrow; Peter Farndon; Ségolène Aymé
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Litigation in clinical research: malpractice doctrines versus research realities.

Authors:  E Haavi Morreim
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Ethical and practical considerations in the management of incidental findings in pediatric MRI studies.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kumra; Manzar Ashtari; Britt Anderson; Kelly L Cervellione; L I Kan
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Thresholds and boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Naveen N Kumar; Suchitra Godara; Janice A Casamina; Robert Hom; Gregory Galdino; Peter Dell; Darice Liu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications.

Authors:  W Burke; L E Pinsky; N A Press
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

8.  Incidental findings in pediatric research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Katherine J Carpenter
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  45 in total

1.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Compare and contrast: a cross-national study across UK, USA and Greek experts regarding return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.

Authors:  Elli G Gourna; Natalie Armstrong; Susan E Wallace
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Laura A Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access.

Authors:  Rebecca Branum; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 8.  [Incidental radiological findings].

Authors:  S Weckbach; C L Schlett; R C Bertheau; H-U Kauczor
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Incidental computer tomography radiologic findings through research participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study.

Authors:  Anna Espinoza; Kendra Malone; Elizabeth Balyakina; Kimberly G Fulda; Roberto Cardarelli
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  How do researchers manage genetic results in practice? The experience of the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Douglass Fisher; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Sheri D Schully; Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Judith A Maskiell; Noralane M Lindor; John L Hopper; Terrilea Burnett; Spring Holter; Julie L Arnold; Steven Gallinger; Mercy Laurino; Mary-Jane Esplen; Pamela S Sinicrope
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.