Literature DB >> 24027034

Modulation sensitivity in the perceptual organization of speech.

Robert E Remez1, Emily F Thomas, Kathryn R Dubowski, Stavroula M Koinis, Natalie A C Porter, Nina U Paddu, Marina Moskalenko, Yael S Grossman.   

Abstract

In a spoken utterance, a talker expresses linguistic constituents in serial order. A listener resolves these linguistic properties in the rapidly fading auditory sample. Classic measures agree that auditory integration occurs at a fine temporal grain. In contrast, recent studies have proposed that sensory integration of speech occurs at a coarser grain, approximate to the syllable, on the basis of indirect and relatively insensitive perceptual measures. Evidence from cognitive neuroscience and behavioral primatology has also been adduced to support the claim of sensory integration at the pace of syllables. In the present investigation, we used direct performance measures of integration, applying an acoustic technique to isolate the contribution of short-term acoustic properties to the assay of modulation sensitivity. In corroborating the classic finding of a fine temporal grain of integration, these functional measures can inform theory and speculation in accounts of speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027034      PMCID: PMC3823531          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0542-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Q J Fu; J J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating speech spectra for copy synthesis by linear prediction and by hand.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Morgana L Davids; Emily F Thomas; Nina U Paddu; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

Review 7.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Auditory language comprehension of temporally reversed speech signals in native and non-native speakers.

Authors:  Miklos Kiss; Tamara Cristescu; Martina Fink; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.579

View more
  3 in total

1.  Constraints on Sensitivity to Auditory Modulation in the Perceptual Organization of Speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas; Andrea M Wycoff; Rebecca E Giglio; Aislinn T Crank; Chloe B Cheimets; Stavroula M Koinis
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Intelligibility of locally time-reversed speech: A multilingual comparison.

Authors:  Kazuo Ueda; Yoshitaka Nakajima; Wolfgang Ellermeier; Florian Kattner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Perceptual Restoration of Temporally Distorted Speech in L1 vs. L2: Local Time Reversal and Modulation Filtering.

Authors:  Mako Ishida; Takayuki Arai; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.