Literature DB >> 11303930

Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Q J Fu1, J J Galvin.   

Abstract

This experiment examined the effects of spectral resolution and fine spectral structure on recognition of spectrally asynchronous sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners. Sentence recognition was measured in six normal-hearing subjects listening to either full-spectrum or noise-band processors and five Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners fitted with 4-channel continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processors. For the full-spectrum processor, the speech signals were divided into either 4 or 16 channels. For the noise-band processor, after band-pass filtering into 4 or 16 channels, the envelope of each channel was extracted and used to modulate noise of the same bandwidth as the analysis band, thus eliminating the fine spectral structure available in the full-spectrum processor. For the 4-channel CIS processor, the amplitude envelopes extracted from four bands were transformed to electric currents by a power function and the resulting electric currents were used to modulate pulse trains delivered to four electrode pairs. For all processors, the output of each channel was time-shifted relative to other channels, varying the channel delay across channels from 0 to 240 ms (in 40-ms steps). Within each delay condition, all channels were desynchronized such that the cross-channel delays between adjacent channels were maximized, thereby avoiding local pockets of channel synchrony. Results show no significant difference between the 4- and 16-channel full-spectrum speech processor for normal-hearing listeners. Recognition scores dropped significantly only when the maximum delay reached 200 ms for the 4-channel processor and 240 ms for the 16-channel processor. When fine spectral structures were removed in the noise-band processor, sentence recognition dropped significantly when the maximum delay was 160 ms for the 16-channel noise-band processor and 40 ms for the 4-channel noise-band processor. There was no significant difference between implant listeners using the 4-channel CIS processor and normal-hearing listeners using the 4-channel noise-band processor. The results imply that when fine spectral structures are not available, as in the implant listener's case, increased spectral resolution is important for overcoming cross-channel asynchrony in speech signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303930     DOI: 10.1121/1.1344158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rate-invariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Michael Kiefte; Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation sensitivity in the perceptual organization of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas; Kathryn R Dubowski; Stavroula M Koinis; Natalie A C Porter; Nina U Paddu; Marina Moskalenko; Yael S Grossman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Asynchrony tolerance in the perceptual organization of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Daria F Ferro; Stephanie C Wissig; Claire A Landau
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

5.  Constraints on Sensitivity to Auditory Modulation in the Perceptual Organization of Speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas; Andrea M Wycoff; Rebecca E Giglio; Aislinn T Crank; Chloe B Cheimets; Stavroula M Koinis
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 6.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Early recognition of speech.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Emily F Thomas
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.