Literature DB >> 26686239

GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.

A Patel1, G S Sayuk1,2, V M Kushnir1, W W Chan3, C P Gyawali1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combinations of reflux parameters (acid exposure time, AET; symptom association probability, SAP) on pH-impedance monitoring describe varying confidence in reflux evidence. We compared outcomes between phenotypes with distinct pre-identified reflux parameters.
METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients undergoing pH-impedance testing over a 5-year period were phenotyped by strength of reflux evidence as strong (abnormal AET, positive SAP), good (abnormal AET, negative SAP), reflux hypersensitivity (RH, normal AET, positive SAP), and equivocal evidence of reflux, and compared to two historical institutional pH monitoring cohorts. Symptom burden (dominant symptom intensity, DSI; global symptom severity, GSS) was assessed by questionnaire at baseline and on prospective follow-up and compared between phenotypes. KEY
RESULTS: Of 94 patients tested off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, baseline symptom burden was highest with strong reflux evidence and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.01; GSS: p = 0.03 across groups). After 3.1 ± 0.2 years follow-up, symptomatic improvement with surgical or medical therapy was highest with strong or good evidence, and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.008; GSS: p = 0.005 across groups). This was most pronounced for typical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.001; GSS: 0.016 across groups), but not atypical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.6; GSS: p = 0.2). For testing on PPI therapy, only GSS followed a similar trend (GSS: p = 0.057, DSI: p = 0.3). Compared to historical cohorts with pH monitoring alone, equivocal evidence for reflux was partly replaced by RH, especially off PPI (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Phenotyping gastroesophageal reflux disease by the strength of reflux evidence on pH-impedance testing off PPI efficiently stratifies symptomatic outcome, especially for typical symptoms, and could be useful in planning management.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastroesophageal reflux disease; pH-impedance testing; strength of reflux evidence; symptom-reflux association

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686239      PMCID: PMC4808441          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  25 in total

1.  Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Walter W Chan; Laura R Haroian; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  High resolution manometry patterns distinguish acid sensitivity in non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Assessment of concordance of symptom reflux association tests in ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  V M Kushnir; A Sathyamurthy; J Drapekin; S Gaddam; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Characterization of reflux events after fundoplication using combined impedance-pH recording.

Authors:  S Roman; G Poncet; I Serraj; F Zerbib; J Boulez; F Mion
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.

Authors:  B L Weusten; J M Roelofs; L M Akkermans; G P Van Berge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Clinical, but not oesophageal pH-impedance, profiles predict response to proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Kafia Belhocine; Mireille Simon; Maylis Capdepont; François Mion; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Jean-Paul Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of proton-pump inhibitor treatment on symptoms and quality of life in GERD patients depends on the symptom-reflux association.

Authors:  Marissa C Aanen; Bas L A M Weusten; Mattijs E Numans; Niek J de Wit; Melvin Samsom; André J P M Smout
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Wireless pH monitoring in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash; Ray E Clouse
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Long-term therapeutic outcome of patients undergoing ambulatory pH monitoring for chronic unexplained cough.

Authors:  Michael J Hersh; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin.

Authors:  G Ghillebert; J Janssens; G Vantrappen; F Nevens; J Piessens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  12 in total

1.  Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.

Authors:  Marzio Frazzoni; Nicola de Bortoli; Leonardo Frazzoni; Manuele Furnari; Irene Martinucci; Salvatore Tolone; Andrea Farioli; Santino Marchi; Lorenzo Fuccio; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Genetic risk factors for perception of symptoms in GERD: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  A Patel; S Hasak; B D Nix; G S Sayuk; R D Newberry; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 3.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Albert J Bredenoord; Mark Fox; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance on pH-impedance monitoring predicts reflux burden and symptomatic outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A Patel; D Wang; N Sainani; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Transoral incisionless fundoplication is cost-effective for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Lyndon P James; Sanchit Gupta; Walter W Chan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 7.  A review of medical therapy for proton pump inhibitor nonresponsive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Hillman; R Yadlapati; A J Thuluvath; M A Berendsen; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment outcomes of reflux hypersensitivity detected on pH-impedance monitoring.

Authors:  A Patel; G S Sayuk; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Critical appraisal of Rome IV criteria: hypersensitive esophagus does belong to gastroesophageal reflux disease spectrum.

Authors:  Leonardo Frazzoni; Marzio Frazzoni; Nicola de Bortoli; Salvatore Tolone; Irene Martinucci; Lorenzo Fuccio; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-10

10.  Chronic Cough Is Associated With Long Breaks in Esophageal Peristaltic Integrity on High-resolution Manometry.

Authors:  Michael C Bennett; Amit Patel; Nitin Sainani; Dan Wang; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.