Literature DB >> 4053917

Variations in clinical presentation of patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities.

W L Reidel, R E Clouse.   

Abstract

All patients referred over a one-year period for clinical esophageal manometry were asked to carefully characterize their esophageal symptoms on a self-report questionnaire. Seventy-five patients (48%) were found to have one or more of four contraction abnormalities in the distal esophagus which are thought to be associated with esophageal symptoms. Duration of any of the five symptoms sought (chest pain, dysphagia for solids, dysphagia for liquids, heartburn, regurgitation) varied from two weeks to 28 years (median two years). The prevalence of the individual esophageal symptoms was similar for each of the four contraction abnormalities. Chest pain was the most common symptom and did not vary in prevalence with the cumulative number of manometric abnormalities. In contrast, dysphagia for either liquids or solids tended to increase in prevalence with manometric severity. The variation in location of reported chest pain and dysphagia was remarkable. Although heartburn was reported as a presenting symptom by 48%, this symptom was reproduced by acid instillation in less than half of those so studied. We conclude that esophageal symptoms are generally poor predictors of manometric findings within this group and that variations in clinical presentation are common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4053917     DOI: 10.1007/BF01315604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  18 in total

1.  A rapid pull-through technique for measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; J J Stef; W N Miller; S B Lydon; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Comparison of experimental esophageal pain with clinical pain of angina pectoris and esophageal disease.

Authors:  P KRAMER; W HOLLANDER
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm.

Authors:  D O Castell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1976-05

4.  High-amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain.

Authors:  M Traube; R Albibi; R W McCallum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Diffuse esophageal spasm: a reappraisal.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Esophageal manometric studies: a perspective of their physiologic and clinical relevance.

Authors:  D O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  High amplitude, peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia.

Authors:  S B Benjamin; D C Gerhardt; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Chest pain and dysphagia in patients with prolonged peristaltic contractile duration of the esophagus.

Authors:  J P Herrington; T W Burns; L A Balart
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body in patients referred to manometry. A new approach to manometric classification.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Chest pain, dysphagia, and high amplitude esophageal peristalsis: a clinical and manometric study.

Authors:  J P Herrington; T W Burns; L A Balart
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  18 in total

1.  Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  M D Mello; S Duraiswamy; L H Price; Y Li; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Clinical and manometric course of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Michaela Müller; Alexander J Eckardt; Björn Göpel; Volker F Eckardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Parameters on esophageal pH-impedance monitoring that predict outcomes of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Farhan Quader; Chanakyaram Reddy; Amit Patel; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 5.  New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance.

Authors:  Jason A Wilson; Marcelo F Vela
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

6.  Achalasia symptom response after Heller myotomy segregated by high-resolution manometry subtypes.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Ami Patel; Faiz A Mirza; Samad Soudagar; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 7.  Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales.

Authors:  V Pratap Mouli; Vineet Ahuja
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-23

Review 8.  A rational clinical approach to esophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  J A DiPalma; G W Meyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Accuracy of abbreviated manometry in detecting esophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  R E Clouse; L B Weinstock; D M Ferney
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve.

Authors:  Anisa Shaker; Nathaniel Stoikes; Jesse Drapekin; Vladimir Kushnir; L Michael Brunt; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.