Literature DB >> 24019018

No evidence for directional biases in inhibition of return.

Janice J Snyder1, William C Schmidt.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of "inhibition of return" (IOR) has been the subject of considerable research interest for nearly 30 years. Two reports claiming directional biases in IOR (Spalek & Hammad, Perception & Psychophysics 66:219-233, 2004, Psychological Science 16:15-18, 2005) were examined more closely, as such findings challenge the theoretical role attributed to IOR and imply that this purported mechanism for the facilitation of visual search would bias search in systematic ways. The data from two new experiments, as well as reanalysis of the original data, showed the reports to result from an unconventional method of calculating IOR that confounded visual field with target location. Although we found significant differences in target detection response times between the visual fields, directional biases were absent from all of the examined data when the conventional method of computing IOR was applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24019018     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0511-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.

Authors:  S Danziger; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Abnormal inhibition of return: A review and new data on patients with parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Glyn W Humphreys; Luis J Fuentes
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Sherief Hammad
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

5.  The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting.

Authors:  Janice J Snyder; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

7.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995).

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; F L Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Umiltà
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-04

9.  The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.

Authors:  H J Müller; J M Findlay
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1988-11

10.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.