Literature DB >> 1775667

Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

M Cheal1, D R Lyon.   

Abstract

There are suggestions in the literature that spatial precuing of attention with peripheral and central cues may be mediated by different mechanisms. To investigate this issue, data from two previous papers were reanalysed to investigate the complete time course of precuing target location with either: (1) a peripheral cue that may draw attention reflexively, or (2) a central, symbolic cue that may require attention to be directed voluntarily. This analysis led to predictions that were tested in another experiment. The main result of this experiment was that a peripheral cue produced its largest effects on discrimination performance within 100 msec, whereas a central cue required approximately 300 msec to achieve maximum effects. In conjunction with previous findings, the present evidence for time differences between the two cuing conditions suggests that more than one process is involved in the spatial precuing of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775667     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  87 in total

1.  Priming effects in attentional gating.

Authors:  J Juola; P Duvuru; M S Peterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C P Talgar; E L Cameron
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2001

3.  Eliminating flanker effects and negative priming in the flankers task: evidence for early selection.

Authors:  L Paquet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

4.  Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; G R Mangun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

7.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

8.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

10.  Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.