Literature DB >> 15660846

The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.

Thomas M Spalek1, Sherief Hammad.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown a left-to-right bias in the inhibition-of-return effect. This bias was found in a sample of English-speaking participants who read in a predominantly left-to-right manner. The goal of the current study was to examine the role that the direction of text reading plays in this bias. The findings replicated the left-to-right bias with an English sample, but showed the opposite bias in an Arabic sample, who read text from right to left. Thus, the regularity of shifting attention in a particular way during text reading seems to be the cause of the bias observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660846     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00774.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  32 in total

1.  Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

2.  Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations.

Authors:  Georg Jahn; Markus Knauff; P N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

3.  The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

4.  A microcircuit model of the frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Jakob Heinzle; Klaus Hepp; Kevan A C Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  On the Eye Movement Control of Changing Reading Direction for a Single Word: The Case of Reading Numerals in Urdu.

Authors:  Azizuddin Khan; Otto Loberg; Jarkko Hautala
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

7.  Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Amanda Cole; Koonal Shah; Brendan Mulhern; Yan Feng; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-05-31

8.  Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Ibrahim S Al-Harthy; Christopher A Was; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

9.  Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: the role of reading and writing direction.

Authors:  Antonio Román; Abderrahman El Fathi; Julio Santiago
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

10.  Investigating attention in complex visual search.

Authors:  Christopher K Kovach; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.