Literature DB >> 8965063

Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations: commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995).

S P Tipper1, B Weaver, F L Watson.   

Abstract

J. Pratt and R.A. Abrams (1995) reported that the inhibition of return of attention is found only for the most recently attended of 2 cued locations. This study does not dispute their findings, but suggests that a more ecologically valid experiment would have more than 2 possible target locations. Twelve male students participated in an experiment in which the target may occur in 1 of 4 possible locations, after 3 of those locations have been cued exogenously in sequence. Inhibition of return was found for each of the cued locations. This result suggests that inhibition may be an important mechanism for aiding visual search in complex environments.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8965063     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

2.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Rapid onset and long-term inhibition of return in the multiple cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-14

5.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

6.  The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Joaquín M M Vaquero; Luis Jiménez; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.

Authors:  María Jesús Funes; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-01-06

9.  Inhibitory tagging in inhibition of return: evidence from flanker interference with multiple distractor features.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Luis J Fuentes; Angeles F Estevez; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

10.  Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Ioanna Liaromati; Elvira Masoura; Katerina Chatzikallia
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.