Literature DB >> 24012620

In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology.

B S Borotikar1, F T Sheehan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish an in vivo, normative patellofemoral (PF) cartilage contact mechanics database acquired during voluntary muscle control using a novel, dynamic, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based, computational methodology and validate the contact mechanics sensitivity to the known sub-millimeter methodological accuracies.
DESIGN: Dynamic cine phase-contrast and multi-plane cine (MPC) images were acquired while female subjects (n = 20, sample of convenience) performed an open kinetic chain (knee flexion-extension) exercise inside a 3-T MR scanner. Static cartilage models were created from high resolution three-dimensional static MR data and accurately placed in their dynamic pose at each time frame based on the cine-PC (CPC) data. Cartilage contact parameters were calculated based on the surface overlap. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and a one-sample repeated measures ANOVA. The sensitivity of the contact parameters to the known errors in the PF kinematics was determined.
RESULTS: Peak mean PF contact area was 228.7 ± 173.6 mm(2) at 40° knee angle. During extension, contact centroid and peak strain locations tracked medially on the femoral and patellar cartilage and were not significantly different from each other. At 25°, 30°, 35°, and 40° of knee extension, contact area was significantly different. Contact area and centroid locations were insensitive to rotational and translational perturbations.
CONCLUSION: This study is a first step towards unfolding the biomechanical pathways to anterior PF pain and osteoarthritis (OA) using dynamic, in vivo, and accurate methodologies. The database provides crucial data for future studies and for validation of, or as an input to, computational models. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Cartilage; Femur; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis; Patella; Patellofemoral pain syndrome; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24012620      PMCID: PMC5548374          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  47 in total

1.  In regards to the "ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data".

Authors:  F T Sheehan; P Mitiguy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The effects of axial and multi-plane loading of the extensor mechanism on the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Christopher M. Powers; James C. Lilley; Thay Q. Lee
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Authors:  Bhushan S Borotikar; William H Sipprell; Emily E Wible; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Etiology and pathophysiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Bert Mandelbaum; David Waddell
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 5.  Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joseph A Buckwalter; Henry J Mankin; Alan J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2005

6.  A modeling framework to estimate patellofemoral joint cartilage stress in vivo.

Authors:  Thor F Besier; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupré; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Regulation of the patellofemoral contact area: an essential mechanism in patellofemoral joint mechanics?

Authors:  Ioannis G Goudakos; Christian König; Philip B Schöttle; William R Taylor; Jan-Erik Hoffmann; Berry M Pöpplau; Navrag B Singh; Georg N Duda; Markus O Heller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Signalling cascades in mechanotransduction: cell-matrix interactions and mechanical loading.

Authors:  L Ramage; G Nuki; D M Salter
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  In vivo assessment of patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals who are pain free.

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; Samuel R Ward; Michael R Terk; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  20 in total

1.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Current clinical, radiological and treatment perspectives of patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Aishwarya Gulati; Christopher McElrath; Vibhor Wadhwa; Jay P Shah; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Normalized patellofemoral joint reaction force is greater in individuals with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Lucas T Thomeer; Frances T Sheehan; Jennifer N Jackson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Clinical Utility of Continuous Radial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition at 3 T in Real-time Patellofemoral Kinematic Assessment: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Daniel Kaplan; Tobias Block; Gregory Chang; Laith Jazrawi; Kirk Campbell; Michael Alaia
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  New Techniques in MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Thumanoon Ruangchaijatuporn; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Reinforcement of articular cartilage with a tissue-interpenetrating polymer network reduces friction and modulates interstitial fluid load support.

Authors:  B G Cooper; T B Lawson; B D Snyder; M W Grinstaff
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Effect of Loading on In Vivo Tibiofemoral and Patellofemoral Kinematics of Healthy and ACL-Reconstructed Knees.

Authors:  Jarred M Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Richard Kijowski; Geoffrey Baer; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Inter- and intra-rater reliability of patellofemoral kinematic and contact area quantification by fast spin echo MRI and correlation with cartilage health by quantitative T1ρ MRI.

Authors:  Brian C Lau; Daniel U Thuillier; Valentina Pedoia; Ellison Y Chen; Zhihong Zhang; Brian T Feeley; Richard B Souza
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Frances T Sheehan; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2015: MRI assessments of cartilage mechanics, morphology and composition following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Michael F Vignos; Fang Liu; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.