Literature DB >> 26213361

MRI-based analysis of patellofemoral cartilage contact, thickness, and alignment in extension, and during moderate and deep flexion.

Benjamin R Freedman1, Frances T Sheehan2, Amy L Lerner3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several factors are believed to contribute to patellofemoral joint function throughout knee flexion including patellofemoral (PF) kinematics, contact, and bone morphology. However, data evaluating the PF joint in this highly flexed state have been limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate patellofemoral contact and alignment in low (0°), moderate (60°), and deep (140°) knee flexion, and then correlate these parameters to each other, as well as to femoral morphology.
METHODS: Sagittal magnetic resonance images were acquired on 14 healthy female adult knees (RSRB approved) using a 1.5 T scanner with the knee in full extension, mid-flexion, and deep flexion. The patellofemoral cartilage contact area, lateral contact displacement (LCD), cartilage thickness, and lateral patellar displacement (LPD) throughout flexion were defined. Intra- and inter-rater repeatability measures were determined. Correlations between patellofemoral contact parameters, alignment, and sulcus morphology were calculated.
RESULTS: Measurement repeatability ICCs ranged from 0.94 to 0.99. Patellofemoral cartilage contact area and thickness, LCD, and LPD were statistically different throughout all levels of flexion (p<0.001). The cartilage contact area was correlated to LPD, cartilage thickness, sulcus angle, and epicondylar width (r=0.47-0.72, p<0.05). DISCUSSION: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the patellofemoral joint throughout its range of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: This study agrees with past studies that investigated patellofemoral measures at a single flexion angle, and provides new insights into the relationship between patellofemoral contact and alignment at multiple flexion angles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study provides a detailed analysis of the patellofemoral joint in vivo, and demonstrates the feasibility of using standard clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanners to image the knee joint in deep flexion.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep knee flexion; Knee; Patellofemoral biomechanics; Patellofemoral joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26213361      PMCID: PMC5536899          DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  42 in total

1.  A four-element phased array coil for high resolution and parallel MR imaging of the knee.

Authors:  Wingchi E Kwok; Jianhui Zhong; Zhigang You; Gwysuk Seo; Saara M S Totterman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Kinematics of the patella in deep flexion. Analysis with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Nakagawa; Y Kadoya; A Kobayashi; I Tatsumi; N Nishida; Y Yamano
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; Wendy Strugnell; Gary Cowin; David M Doddrell; Richard Slaughter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Verification of predicted specimen-specific natural and implanted patellofemoral kinematics during simulated deep knee bend.

Authors:  Mark A Baldwin; Chadd Clary; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Patellofemoral joint kinematics in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  N J MacIntyre; N A Hill; R A Fellows; R E Ellis; D R Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  K D Connolly; J L Ronsky; L M Westover; J C Küpper; R Frayne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Computational assessment of the influence of vastus medialis obliquus function on patellofemoral pressures: model evaluation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Srianjana Kilambi; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Q-angle and J-sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Kenneth M Fine; Timothy J Brindle; Katharine E Alter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint.

Authors:  Kristen R Hovinga; Amy L Lerner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  In vivo assessment of patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals who are pain free.

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; Samuel R Ward; Michael R Terk; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Biomaterials to Mimic and Heal Connective Tissues.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Distalization and Medialization of Tibial Tuberosity for the Treatment of Potential Patellar Instability with Patella Alta.

Authors:  Davide Enea; Pier Paolo Canè; Marco Fravisini; Antonio Gigante; Luca Dei Giudici
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2018-06-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.