Literature DB >> 22284428

A methodology to accurately quantify patellofemoral cartilage contact kinematics by combining 3D image shape registration and cine-PC MRI velocity data.

Bhushan S Borotikar1, William H Sipprell, Emily E Wible, Frances T Sheehan.   

Abstract

Patellofemoral osteoarthritis and its potential precursor patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) are common, costly, and debilitating diseases. PFPS has been shown to be associated with altered patellofemoral joint mechanics; however, an actual variation in joint contact stresses has not been established due to challenges in accurately quantifying in vivo contact kinematics (area and location). This study developed and validated a method for tracking dynamic, in vivo cartilage contact kinematics by combining three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, cine-phase contrast (CPC), multi-plane cine (MPC), and 3D high-resolution static imaging. CPC and MPC data were acquired from 12 healthy volunteers while they actively extended/flexed their knee within the MRI scanner. Since no gold standard exists for the quantification of in vivo dynamic cartilage contact kinematics, the accuracy of tracking a single point (patellar origin relative to the femur) represented the accuracy of tracking the kinematics of an entire surface. The accuracy was determined by the average absolute error between the PF kinematics derived through registration of MPC images to a static model and those derived through integration of the CPC velocity data. The accuracy ranged from 0.47 mm to 0.77 mm for the patella and femur and from 0.68 mm to 0.86 mm for the patellofemoral joint. For purely quantifying joint kinematics, CPC remains an analytically simpler and more accurate (accuracy <0.33 mm) technique. However, for application requiring the tracking of an entire surface, such as quantifying cartilage contact kinematics, this combined imaging approach produces accurate results with minimal operator intervention. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284428      PMCID: PMC3310346          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  28 in total

1.  In regards to the "ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data".

Authors:  F T Sheehan; P Mitiguy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing.

Authors:  Samuel R Ward; Michael R Terk; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Normative three-dimensional patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic, in vivo study.

Authors:  Andrea R Seisler; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Natural course of knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged subjects with knee pain: 12-year follow-up using clinical and radiographic criteria.

Authors:  C A Thorstensson; M L E Andersson; H Jönsson; T Saxne; I F Petersson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Is cartilage thickness different in young subjects with and without patellofemoral pain?

Authors:  C E Draper; T F Besier; G E Gold; M Fredericson; A Fiene; G S Beaupre; S L Delp
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; S Snow; C Cooper; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  K D Connolly; J L Ronsky; L M Westover; J C Küpper; R Frayne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Patella malalignment, pain and patellofemoral progression: the Health ABC Study.

Authors:  D J Hunter; Y Q Zhang; J B Niu; D T Felson; K Kwoh; A Newman; S Kritchevsky; T Harris; L Carbone; M Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  In vivo noninvasive evaluation of abnormal patellar tracking during squatting in patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Nicole A Wilson; Joel M Press; Jason L Koh; Ronald W Hendrix; Li-Qun Zhang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Accuracy of biplane x-ray imaging combined with model-based tracking for measuring in-vivo patellofemoral joint motion.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Kline; Scott Tashman; Roger Zauel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  11 in total

1.  In vivo patellofemoral contact mechanics during active extension using a novel dynamic MRI-based methodology.

Authors:  B S Borotikar; F T Sheehan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  New Techniques in MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Thumanoon Ruangchaijatuporn; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Fully automated patellofemoral MRI segmentation using holistically nested networks: Implications for evaluating patellofemoral osteoarthritis, pain, injury, pathology, and adolescent development.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Natalia A Alexandridi; Richard M Smith; Aricia Shen; William Gandler; Evan McCreedy; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Functional imaging in OA: role of imaging in the evaluation of tissue biomechanics.

Authors:  C P Neu
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Knee cartilage MRI with in situ mechanical loading using prospective motion correction.

Authors:  Thomas Lange; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Cris Lovell-Smith; Kaywan Izadpanah; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The effective quadriceps and patellar tendon moment arms relative to the tibiofemoral finite helical axis.

Authors:  Hyun Soo Im; Oren Goltzer; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging morphometry of the patella bone in South Indian population.

Authors:  Reshma Muhamed; Vasudha V Saralaya; B V Murlimanju; Ganesh Kumar Chettiar
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-06-27

Review 8.  Dynamic MRI for articulating joint evaluation on 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners: setup, protocols, and real-time sequences.

Authors:  Marc Garetier; Bhushan Borotikar; Karim Makki; Sylvain Brochard; François Rousseau; Douraïed Ben Salem
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-05-19

9.  Assessment of In Vivo Lumbar Inter-Vertebral Motion: Reliability of a Novel Dynamic Weight-Bearing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique Using a Side-Bending Task.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Stephane Montuelle; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-01-30

Review 10.  Advancing quantitative techniques to improve understanding of the skeletal structure-function relationship.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; Elizabeth L Brainerd; Karen L Troy; Sandra J Shefelbine; Janet L Ronsky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.