| Literature DB >> 24003032 |
Ce Zhang1, Armando Hernandez-Garcia, Kai Jiang, Zongying Gong, Durgarao Guttula, Siow Yee Ng, Piravi P Malar, Jeroen A van Kan, Liang Dai, Patrick S Doyle, Renko de Vries, Johan R C van der Maarel.
Abstract
The effect of a cationic-neutral diblock polypeptide on the conformation ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24003032 PMCID: PMC3814371 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nucleic Acids Res ISSN: 0305-1048 Impact factor: 16.971
Figure 1.Illustration of a bottlebrush formed by binding of a diblock polypeptide copolymer to DNA. The binding block of the copolymer contains 12 cationic lysine residues.
Figure 2.Degradation of pMTL23 (3.7 kb) by DNAaseI. The plasmid and DNAseI concentrations are 7.2 nM and 8.8 U/ml, respectively. Lanes 1, 12 and 21: DNA molar weight marker. Lanes 2–11: reaction product of bare DNA after 1, 5, 8, 15, 25, 35, 45, 60 min of incubation, respectively. Lanes 13–20: as lanes 2–11, but for C4K12-coated DNA with N/P = 7.5.
Figure 3.(A) Montage of fluorescence images of T4-DNA in 250 × 250 nm2 channels and in 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.5). From left to right, N/P = 0 (polypeptide-free), 0.1, 1.0 and 2.0. The scale bar denotes 6 μm and the YOYO-1 intercalation ratio is 100 bp per dye molecule. (B) Distribution in extension of a population of ∼50 T4-DNA molecules with indicated N/P ratio. Gaussian fits give mean extensions of = 16 ± 2, 25 ± 3, 41 ± 3 and 48 ± 3 μm for N/P = 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 2.0, respectively.
Figure 4.Relative extension of T4-DNA (open symbols) and λ-DNA (closed symbols) in 10 mM Tris/HCl versus channel diameter D. The N/P ratios are 0 (▵), 0.1 (▿), 1.0 (□) and 2.0 (○). The solid curves represent Monte Carlo results with noted values of persistence length P and width w. The dashed curve represents deflection theory for narrow channels.
Figure 5.(A) Montage of fluorescence images of λ-DNA. The images obtained with YOYO-1 (green) and Alexa Fluor 541 (red) staining are superposed. The molecules are confined in 150 × 250 nm2 channels with N/P = 2.0. Labelling sites are noted. The scale bar denotes 5 μm. (B) As in panel (A), but for combed λ-DNA. (C) Time dependence of the Alexa Fluor intensity profile pertaining to N/P = 2.0 and in a 150 × 250 nm2 channel. The exposure time is 500 ms. (D) Average Alexa profile over a pool of 50 molecules with N/P = 2.0 and in 150 × 250 nm2 channels.
Figure 6.(A–D) Tapping mode atomic force microscopy images of linearized pUC18 DNA complexed with increasing amounts of polypeptide. The N/P ratios are 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 2.0, in panels A, B, C and D, respectively. (E, F) As in panels (A–D), but for DNA with N/P = 2.0. The scale bar denotes 1 μm. Panels B–D are a montage.
Figure 7.Orientation correlation of the tangent vectors at a pair of points separated by distance L along the contour. The lines represent exponential fits, and the polypeptide to DNA N/P ratios are noted. The fitted values of the persistence lengths P = 60 ± 5, 95 ± 5, 190 ± 10 and 240 ± 10 nm for N/P = 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 2.0, respectively.