Literature DB >> 24002761

Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

John S Bolton1, William C Conway, Abbas E Abbas.   

Abstract

Cervical anastomotic leak rates are high after esophagectomy. We examined the effect of a purposeful delay in institution of oral diet after esophagectomy on the leak rate and hospital length of stay. A retrospective analysis of 120 patients submitted to esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was conducted. Eighty-seven resumed diet within 7 days of surgery (early eaters), and 33 had delayed diet until a mean of 12 days after surgery (late eaters). Mean age was 62.3 years; 98 patients were male. One hundred one resections were for cancer, and 49 % of cancer patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The overall leak rate was 17.5 %, and hospital length of stay was 10.9 days. Anastomotic leak rate was 3 % for late eaters versus 23 % for early eaters (OR of 9.57, p = 0.010). Hospital length of stay was 6 days for late eaters versus 11.8 days for early eaters (p < 0.001). Anastomotic leak was significantly associated with increased length of stay (p < 0.001), adding an average of 7.6 days to hospital stay. Respiratory complications (p < 0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.014) were also independent predictors of increased length of stay, but early eater status was not. Delayed resumption of oral diet after esophagectomy significantly reduces cervical anastomotic leak rate and avoids the increased length of stay associated with leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24002761     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2322-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.

Authors:  E Laterza; G de' Manzoni; G F Veraldi; A Guglielmi; P Tedesco; C Cordiano
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1999-11

2.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; P Nafteux; D van Raemdonck
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

7.  An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; Mark S Allen; K Robert Shen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Jin-Shing Chen; Pei-Ming Huang; Jang-Ming Lee; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 9.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.

Authors:  G Pines; V Buyeviz; S Machlenkin; Y Klein; A Laor; H Kashtan
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.429

View more
  11 in total

1.  Recent publications by ochsner authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

Review 2.  The feeding route after esophagectomy: a review of literature.

Authors:  Gijs H Berkelmans; Frans van Workum; Teus J Weijs; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Jelle P Ruurda; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Camiel Rosman; Richard van Hillegersberg; Misha D Luyer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Joshua S Hill; Mark K Reames; James Symanowski; Susie C Hurley; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

5.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Anastomosis Leak After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Yosuke Atsumi; Kentaro Hara; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Ayako Tamagawa; Keisuke Komori; Itaru Hashimoto; Yukio Maezawa; Keisuke Kazama; Kazuki Kano; Masaaki Murakawa; Masakatsu Numata; Takashi Oshima; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Study protocol for the nutritional route in oesophageal resection trial: a single-arm feasibility trial (NUTRIENT trial).

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jelle P Ruurda; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Camiel Rosman; Meindert Sosef; Richard V Hillegersberg; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Role of Barium Swallow in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leak following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Simon Roh; Mark D Iannettoni; John C Keech; Mohammad Bashir; Peter J Gruber; Kalpaj R Parekh
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-05

8.  Nutritional route in oesophageal resection trial II (NUTRIENT II): study protocol for a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gijs H K Berkelmans; Bas J W Wilts; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Koshi Kumagai; Magnus Nilsson; Teus J Weijs; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Marc J van Det; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard Zheng; Courtney L Devin; Michael J Pucci; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A nomogram illustrating the probability of anastomotic leakage following cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Joerg Lindenmann; Nicole Fink-Neuboeck; Christian Porubsky; Melanie Fediuk; Udo Anegg; Peter Kornprat; Maria Smolle; Alfred Maier; Josef Smolle; Freyja Maria Smolle-Juettner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.