Literature DB >> 20401920

Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review.

Roger H Kim1, Kazuaki Takabe.   

Abstract

Anastomotic complications are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy for cancer. Conflicting reports exist regarding the superiority of hand-sewn versus stapled techniques. This systematic review identified eight randomized clinical trials examining this issue. None of the studies reported significant differences in leak rate or early mortality. One study demonstrated a difference in stricture rates, with fewer for hand-sewn anastomoses. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one anastomotic technique over the other. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20401920     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  43 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the radiologist's perspective].

Authors:  B D Bundy; H-U Kauczor; L Grenacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Hybrid trans-thoracic esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Fernando A Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Clinical application of mucosal valve technique for anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu-Min Li; Jian-Hua Zhang; Yun-Feng Su; Cheng Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yun-Jiu Gou; Tie-Niu Song; Jian-Bao Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Surgical endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage and perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  F Kuehn; L Schiffmann; B M Rau; E Klar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  [Minimally invasive abdominothoracic esophagus resection by transoral esophagogastrostomy: interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  I Gockel; M Paschold; H Lang; F Heid
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Managing complications I: leaks, strictures, emptying, reflux, chylothorax.

Authors:  Ke-Neng Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosoi; Tetsuya Abe; Norihisa Uemura; Eiji Higaki; Ryosuke Kawai; Jiro Kawakami; Byonggu An; Masato Nagino; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Serial CRP levels following oesophagectomy: a marker for anastomotic dehiscence.

Authors:  Peter McAnena; Colm Neary; Conor Doyle; Michael J Kerin; Oliver J McAnena; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 10.  Surgery of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  F G Uzunoglu; M Reeh; A Kutup; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.