Literature DB >> 19900819

An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.

Sandra C Tomaszek1, Stephen D Cassivi, Mark S Allen, K Robert Shen, Francis C Nichols, Claude Deschamps, Dennis A Wigle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As part of our ongoing quality improvement effort, we evaluated our conventional approach to post-oesophagectomy management by comparing it to an alternative postoperative management pathway.
METHODS: Medical records from 386 consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit for oesophageal cancer or Barrett's oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia were analysed retrospectively (July 2004 to August 2008). The conventional pathway involved a routine radiographic contrast swallow study at 5-7 days after oesophagectomy with initiation of oral intake if no leak was detected. In the alternative pathway, a feeding jejunostomy was placed for enteral feeding and used exclusively until oral intake was gradually initiated at home at 4 weeks after oesophagectomy. No contrast swallow was obtained in the alternative pathway group unless indicated by clinical suspicion of an anastomotic leak. Each group was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with respect to anastomotic leak rates, length of hospitalisation, re-admission and other complications.
RESULTS: A total of 276 (72%) patients underwent conventional postoperative management, 110 (28%) followed the alternative pathway. Patient characteristics were similar in both the groups. The anastomotic leak rate was lower in the alternative pathway with three clinically significant leaks (2.7%) versus 33 in the conventional pathway (12.0%; p=0.01). Among patients undergoing a radiographic contrast swallow examination, a false-negative rate of 5.8% was observed. The swallow study of 14 patients (5.9%) was complicated by aspiration of oral contrast. Postoperatively, 7.3% of patients suffered from pneumonia. There were no significant differences overall in postoperative pulmonary or cardiac complications associated with either pathway. Median length of hospitalisation was 2 days shorter for the alternative pathway (7 days) than the conventional pathway (9 days; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in unplanned re-admission rates.
CONCLUSION: An alternative postoperative pathway following oesophagectomy involving delayed oral intake and avoidance of a routine contrast swallow study is associated with a shortened length of hospitalisation without a higher risk of complication after hospital discharge. Copyright (c) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19900819      PMCID: PMC2930764          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

1.  Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  T Djärv; J Lagergren; J M Blazeby; P Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Outcome after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ in patients aged over 75 years.

Authors:  Eveline Internullo; Johnny Moons; Philippe Nafteux; Willy Coosemans; Georges Decker; Paul De Leyn; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Toni Lerut
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Long-term results of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal neoplasm.

Authors:  Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau; Julie Ward; Neil A Christie; Michael K Gibson; Matthew Schuchert; Kristi Cooper; Stephanie R Land; Chandra P Belani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Judith Boone; Inne Borel Rinkes; Maarten van Leeuwen; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 5.  Nutrition considerations in esophagectomy patients.

Authors:  Cassandra E Kight
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2008 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.080

6.  Postoperative mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: development of a preoperative risk prediction model.

Authors:  Jin Ra; E Carter Paulson; John Kucharczuk; Katrina Armstrong; Christopher Wirtalla; Rachel Rapaport-Kelz; Larry R Kaiser; Francis R Spitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Population-based study of surgical factors in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  M Rutegård; J Lagergren; I Rouvelas; M Lindblad; J M Blazeby; P Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Radiological detection of post-oesophagectomy anastomotic leak - a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy.

Authors:  S Upponi; A Ganeshan; H D'Costa; M Betts; N Maynard; H Bungay; A Slater
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer is associated with enhanced survival.

Authors:  James M Donahue; Francis C Nichols; Zhuo Li; David A Schomas; Mark S Allen; Stephen D Cassivi; Aminah Jatoi; Robert C Miller; Dennis A Wigle; K Robert Shen; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution.

Authors:  Andrew R Davies; Matthew J Forshaw; Aadil A Khan; Alia S Noorani; Vanash M Patel; Dirk C Strauss; Robert C Mason
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  16 in total

1.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The ongoing debate regarding optimal nutritional routes following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ariel W Knight; Shanda H Blackmon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Impact of enhanced recovery program on patients with esophageal cancer in comparison with traditional care.

Authors:  Lihong Wang; Chenjing Zhu; Xuelei Ma; Kai Shen; Hongmei Li; Yuanyuan Hu; Linghong Guo; Jing Zhang; Ping Li
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  A Novel Technique of Paravertebral Thoracic and Preperitoneal Analgesia Enhances Early Recovery After Oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Stephanie Phillips; Jasmina Dedic-Hagan; d'Arcy Ferris Baxter; H Van der Wall; G L Falk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The feeding route after esophagectomy: a review of literature.

Authors:  Gijs H Berkelmans; Frans van Workum; Teus J Weijs; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Jelle P Ruurda; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Camiel Rosman; Richard van Hillegersberg; Misha D Luyer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Routine jejunostomy tube feeding following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Hanneke W J van Eden; Jelle P Ruurda; Misha D P Luyer; Elles Steenhagen; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers.

Authors:  William H Allum; Luigi Bonavina; Stephen D Cassivi; Miguel A Cuesta; Zhao Ming Dong; Valter Nilton Felix; Edgar Figueredo; Piers A C Gatenby; Leonie Haverkamp; Maksat A Ibraev; Mark J Krasna; René Lambert; Rupert Langer; Michael P N Lewis; Katie S Nason; Kevin Parry; Shaun R Preston; Jelle P Ruurda; Lara W Schaheen; Roger P Tatum; Igor N Turkin; Sylvia van der Horst; Donald L van der Peet; Peter C van der Sluis; Richard van Hillegersberg; Justin C R Wormald; Peter C Wu; Barbara M Zonderhuis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy.

Authors:  Melanie Baker; Vanessa Halliday; Robert N Williams; David J Bowrey
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 7.324

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.