Literature DB >> 19431220

The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.

G Pines1, V Buyeviz, S Machlenkin, Y Klein, A Laor, H Kashtan.   

Abstract

Stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy is considered to be superior to traditional handsewn techniques. Linear staplers are usually used. The aim of this study is to evaluate early postoperative results of circular stapler in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Records of all patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 2003-2008 were reviewed. Patients that underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, colon transposition, or linear stapler anastomosis were excluded. Esophagogastric anastomosis was done either handsewn or using circular stapler. Patients underwent either pyloromyotomy, pyloroplasty, or no pyloric intervention. Postoperative leakage was diagnosed either clinically or radiologically. The end-point of this study was the incidence of anastomotic leak in the immediate postoperative period. Eighty-two patients (average age 66 years, male/female, 52/30) met the inclusion criteria. In 30 patients, the anastomosis was handsewn, and in 52 patients, it was done using a circular stapler. Overall operative mortality rate was 4.8% (four patients because of pulmonary or cardiac complications). Anastomotic leak occurred in five (n = 5, 16.6%) patients in the handsewn group and eight (n = 7, 13.4%) patients in the circular stapler group. Pyloric manipulation had no significant effect over the leakage rate. Routine upper-gastrointestinal (GI) series done on the fifth or sixth postoperative day did not reveal any of the leaks. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using an end-to-side circular stapler is feasible and safe, and has comparable outcomes to handsewn anastomosis in regard of leakage rates or other major surgical or general complications. Postoperative GI series seems to be a poor diagnostic tool for anastomotic leakage and could be omitted as a routine study for occult anastomotic leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19431220     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00913.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  5 in total

1.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Satoshi Ono; Risa Takahata; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Isao Kumano; Yusuke Matsumoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Aiko; Takashi Ichikura; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Application of Oesophagogastric Cervical Mechanical Anastomosis in Oesophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Ning Zhang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Embedded cervical esophagogastrostomy: a simple and convenient method using a circular stapler after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomas.

Authors:  Sen Wu; Mingyao Chen; Li Wei; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.