Literature DB >> 23987515

Second try: who returns for additional assisted reproductive technology treatment and the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology birth.

Barbara Luke1, Morton B Brown, Ethan Wantman, Valerie L Baker, Daniel R Grow, Judy E Stern.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a prior assisted reproductive technology (ART) live birth on subsequent live-birth rates.
DESIGN: Historical cohort study.
SETTING: Clinic-based data. PATIENT(S): The study population included 297,635 women with 549,278 cycles from 2004 to 2010 from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System. Try 1 refers to ART cycles up to and including the first live birth, try 2 to ART cycles after a first live birth. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live-birth rates by cycle number, try number, and oocyte source. RESULT(S): Younger women at try 1 are more likely to return for try 2. Women returning for try 2 were more likely to have had an ART singleton versus multiple birth (33.2% after a try 1 singleton versus 8.1% after twins and 4.9% after triplets) and were less likely to have a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve or tubal factors. Live-birth rates were significantly higher for try 2 compared with try 1 for autologous fresh cycles, averaging 7.7 percentage points higher over five cycles. Live-birth rates were not significantly different for try 2 versus try 1 with thawed autologous cycles or either fresh or thawed donor cycles. CONCLUSION(S): These results indicate that when fresh autologous oocytes can be used, live-birth rates per cycle are significantly greater after a prior history of an ART live birth.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prior ART live birth; autologous cycles; donor cycles; live-birth rates

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987515      PMCID: PMC3933999          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  Impact of psychological factors on dropout rates in insured infertility patients.

Authors:  Alice D Domar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Cycle 1 as predictor of assisted reproductive technology treatment outcome over multiple cycles: an analysis of linked cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System online database.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment.

Authors:  A Templeton; J K Morris; W Parslow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population.

Authors:  M Brandes; J O M van der Steen; S B Bokdam; C J C M Hamilton; J P de Bruin; W L D M Nelen; J A M Kremer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The long-term outcome of 946 consecutive couples visiting a fertility clinic in 2001-2003.

Authors:  Janneke Donckers; Johannes L H Evers; Jolande A Land
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; William Gibbons; Glenn L Schattman; Rogerio A Lobo; Richard E Leach; Judy E Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Psychosocial risks associated with multiple births resulting from assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Marcia A Ellison; Selen Hotamisligil; Hang Lee; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Samuel C Pang; Janet E Hall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Patient dropout in an assisted reproductive technology program: implications for pregnancy rates.

Authors:  J A Land; D A Courtar; J L Evers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Ethan Wantman; Avi Lederman; Stacey A Missmer; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Predicting live birth, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in infants born from in vitro fertilisation: a prospective study of 144,018 treatment cycles.

Authors:  Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes among women with a history of cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Stacey A Missmer; Logan G Spector; Richard E Leach; Melanie Williams; Lori Koch; Yolanda R Smith; Judy E Stern; G David Ball; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Embryo banking among women diagnosed with cancer: a pilot population-based study in New York, Texas, and Illinois.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Logan G Spector; Judy E Stern; Yolanda R Smith; Melanie Williams; Lori Koch; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.